From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4885139694 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 05:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58C39E0DDE; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 05:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CD83E0DA4 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 05:33:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:980:4ed9:1:beae:c5ff:fe48:18dc] (unknown [IPv6:2001:980:4ed9:1:beae:c5ff:fe48:18dc]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: graaff) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C3383415B7 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 05:33:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1491802416.27009.5.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Reverse use of Python/Ruby versions From: Hans de Graaff To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 07:33:36 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170410000447.0ce00d73@symphony.aura-online.co.uk> References: <20170410000447.0ce00d73@symphony.aura-online.co.uk> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-3ix9FXBA4tzruykyvDFl" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: b684c6ff-db07-4dcd-ac4c-a5ec04386213 X-Archives-Hash: c1e7e55dfcbcc849061891a29c99081d --=-3ix9FXBA4tzruykyvDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 00:04 +0100, James Le Cuirot wrote: > People thought the sky would fall when 2.4 deprecated Fixnum > and > Bignum. It really didn't. It's still just a warning right now but I > haven't seen that warning since it was dealt with in Rails. >=20 This change broke the rspec test suite quite significantly and to the point where it isn't clear if rspec 3.5 is actually compatible with ruby24 or not. So, no ruby24 target for now, and consequently all packages depending on it also can't get a ruby24 target. Every ruby release will have some breaking changes, and the impact on the tree will depend on which packages it will affect. Hans --=-3ix9FXBA4tzruykyvDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABEIAB0WIQSx3yP+V82AqODatGmIg/pWowio1wUCWOsZMAAKCRCIg/pWowio 13A3AQCBFR+SuWPsNBUSseDgkis+2PG0xCX3ho8AMz3NqrZarAD+IlnGNjskO5Bc BnuDDHOqZ+m3fvkAP3+rZU579wd/X6Q= =myKS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-3ix9FXBA4tzruykyvDFl--