From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14493 invoked by uid 1002); 10 Jun 2003 21:59:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 23176 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2003 21:59:43 -0000 Message-ID: <1483.10.0.0.1.1055286132.squirrel@mooktaking.homeip.net> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 00:02:12 +0100 (BST) From: "MooktaKiNG" To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: Mooktakim@hotmail.com User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] A nice idea to improve portage] X-Archives-Salt: 0e0f53ab-ae40-4124-a3ee-53ed60fda9ba X-Archives-Hash: 92a77c783c2493735c683de48044149f Thats also a very good idea. emailing. This should be an option. becuase not everyone has sendmail or whatever installed. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello, > > Debian emails messages produced by its packages to a specified user. Why > can't portage do the same? Then people who don't want them can ditch them and noone need miss out on a 'for God's sake update this conf before launching prog. x' message again. > > > Cheers, > > Andy > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQE+5k1gX3TTUvZURBERAr1qAJ0fe38TEaP+vrK0TTsQc8w00/nowwCdEg3W aNwlUqFgWlNtf47nCFr3Ws4= > =jAf2 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > > ------------------------------------------------- Please wait while you are redirected to my signature...... ------------------------------------------------- Please wait while you are redirected to my signature...... -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list