From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EPFpe-0003X9-43 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:49:58 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9B8e5eb021663; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:40:05 GMT Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz (gw.top-hosting.cz [81.0.254.91]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9B8bjR0009591 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:37:45 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF1AA465DE for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:47:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wac [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 15079-02-2 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:47:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from www2.chlastej.net (unknown [82.99.172.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689FDA465BC for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:47:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:47:08 +0200 From: Jakub Moc X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1476097237.20051011104708@gentoo.org> To: =?Windows-1250?Q?Jan_Kundr=E1t?= Subject: Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting Thursday October 13th In-Reply-To: <200510111040.03318.jkt@gentoo.org> References: <434A5FA9.206@gentoo.org> <20051010213636.GB27341@CogES> <200510111040.03318.jkt@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="----------10211521D1EBF9E7C" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.3.2 (20050629) at top-hosting.cz X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.692 tagged_above=-999 required=6 tests=[PRIORITY_NO_NAME=1.185, WEIRD_PORT=0.507] X-Spam-Level: * X-Archives-Salt: 3afeeabe-2176-4eaf-9e71-d620b7edd777 X-Archives-Hash: 5c1566101cce840e636f930042d3cb7c ------------10211521D1EBF9E7C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1250 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0D=0A11.10.2005, 10:39:56, Jan Kundr=E1t wrote: > On Monday 10 of October 2005 23:36 Marcin Kryczek wrote: >> council could decide if it's worth to try and put some herd (GDP?) to be >> responsible for it. > Uh, and what *exactly* do you mean by "be responsible for it"? I mean, ar= e we > supposed to watch every possible communication channel or would the peopl= e=20 > involved submit bugs to us about newly made decisions? > Anyway, what about some weekly message to -core? > Cheers, > -jkt Bleh, what's wrong w/ the idea to create gentoo-dev-annouce or whatever it would be called? Many people gave up on reading -core due to the constant flames... --=20 Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:jakub@gentoo.org GPG signature: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xCEB= A3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;) ------------10211521D1EBF9E7C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) iD8DBQFDS3wMhxfV/c66PZ4RAoLqAKCShmnO5hFu3umt/0eO5rSdW2JeeQCgqfdY +DrEmOKphc2ZZIdwnhzSdEo= =7oh9 -----END PGP MESSAGE----- ------------10211521D1EBF9E7C-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list