From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10570 invoked by uid 1002); 5 Aug 2003 23:46:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 12037 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2003 23:46:33 -0000 Message-ID: <1475.192.168.0.90.1060127021.squirrel@192.168.0.150> In-Reply-To: <12930000.1060117254@valkyrie.lsit.ucsb.edu> References: <86960000.1060038977@valkyrie.lsit.ucsb.edu><200308050114.29952.stuart@gentoo.org><200308051134.46249.pauldv@gentoo.org><200308051219.49435.stuart@gentoo.org> <12930000.1060117254@valkyrie.lsit.ucsb.edu> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 18:43:41 -0500 (CDT) From: "Cal Evans" To: "Max Kalika" Cc: stuart@gentoo.org,"Paul de Vrieze" , gentoo-dev@gentoo.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Web Application Installation X-Archives-Salt: 0d91dfb0-446d-457e-9e32-00e27f85f606 X-Archives-Hash: 4702c92d673f4616189090d52d61f61d Max & Stuart, Personally, As someone who runs both types of servers, I would prefer a separate behavior. My server here at the house hosts 1 domain and I like the default way gentoo handles that. It's easy for me to test things out etc. But on my production servers, I like the idea of being able to set +vhosts and have it work as described. Just chiming in on a very interesting thread. My $0.02 worth, take it for what it's worth. =C= * * Cal Evans * http://www.christianperformer.com * Stay plugged in to your audience! * Max Kalika said: > Quoting Stuart Herbert : > Is it really necessary to separate the whole virtual/local? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list