From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E61913832E for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 19:53:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD1A921C216; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 19:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB82D21C14F for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 19:53:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.107] (unknown [92.185.72.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC69F3406DD; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 19:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1471895577.31785.122.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: OpenRC runscript transition (draft 2) From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: pr@gentoo.org Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 21:52:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20160822190356.GA18101@linux1> References: <20160822190356.GA18101@linux1> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-97XbTtN3sc75AKCTOASf" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 11a4dc91-7ad2-41d7-8370-ce7739e4ed0a X-Archives-Hash: 398860609794120da29230dd166ff8dd --=-97XbTtN3sc75AKCTOASf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Oops, I saw your second draft later :S El lun, 22-08-2016 a las 14:03 -0500, William Hubbs escribi=C3=B3: >=20 > [...] > If you have any service scripts after running this command that > generate > this warning, please file bugs against the packages that own these > scripts, not against OpenRC. How risk is the change from=C2=A0#!/sbin/runscript to=C2=A0#!/sbin/openrc-r= un? Can it be done "blindly" simply changing from one to another? In that case it seems not so many packages are pending and, maybe, we could fix them instead of telling people to report bugs once they find the obsolete init.d files (and then wait for each package to get that fixed... and re-emerge that version) $ grep -r "/sbin/runscript" */*/files/* app-admin/prelude-manager/files/prelude-manager.initd:#!/sbin/runscript app-emulation/lxc/files/lxc.initd.4:#!/sbin/runscript app-emulation/lxd/files/lxd-2.0.1.initd:#!/sbin/runscript app-misc/lirc/files/irexec-initd:#!/sbin/runscript net-analyzer/prelude-correlator/files/prelude- correlator.initd:#!/sbin/runscript net-analyzer/prelude-lml/files/prelude-lml.initd:#!/sbin/runscript www-apps/grafana-bin/files/grafana.initd:#!/sbin/runscript www-apps/grafana-bin/files/grafana.initd.2:#!/sbin/runscript There are only a few we could fix just now if we can simply replace the line=C2=A0 --=-97XbTtN3sc75AKCTOASf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEABECAAYFAle7WBkACgkQCaWpQKGI+9RYwwCfU8JMZkQV0d81AnQPNQF647vq UZQAnjLAv9xIqNvN3T/aLXUlAYwq+yg2 =AF39 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-97XbTtN3sc75AKCTOASf--