From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-77016-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04C1C13832E for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 10:32:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F303FE0B4D; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 10:31:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08D69E0B3C for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 10:31:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (176.red-2-136-144.dynamicip.rima-tde.net [2.136.144.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6CBD340BC1 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 10:31:55 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1470565911.854.17.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2016 12:31:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20160806170954.4c2c544838f372217faba4ff@gentoo.org> References: <1470471113.17315.5.camel@gentoo.org> <20160806133719.GD12988@foo.stuge.se> <20160806170954.4c2c544838f372217faba4ff@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 4476f3ef-3f3f-4c40-8dec-80970ebdc07b X-Archives-Hash: aa1a79268faa1839132ae97e7fbdfbf8 El sáb, 06-08-2016 a las 17:09 +0300, Andrew Savchenko escribió: > On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 13:37:19 +0000 Peter Stuge wrote: > > > > Hi Pacho, many thanks for your work, but.. > > > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > > > > Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 15:22:22 +0200 > > > > ..do you think you can arrange to post everything in one mail, > > instead of 14 different ones in a single day? > > I suppose these posts are automated (at least partially), since each > of them is linked to a different retirement bug. So you shouldn't > blame Pacho for his work. > > Best regards, > Andrew Savchenko No, sadly all the work is manual... and that is the reason I do every step per person, because as it takes lots of time, I want to finish one person completely before either jumping to the next or going to do other things. The reason is that I cannot predict if I will be able to handle all the remaining cases or, maybe, I will need to do 3 today, 5 tomorrow... maybe 10 in two months when I have time again. This way at least I let people to start getting the packages as soon as I finish a person and other can start to work as soon as possible on the bug reports without needing to wait for me finishing all. Then, it's a bit a consequence of the workflow (paradoxically, I have a different workflow when treecleaning that ends up usually with me sending a big mail with the packages I am able to hardmask on a day... and some people complained because they wanted one mail per package ^_^)