From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973261383E0 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 15:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C2D4821C03E; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 15:10:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF48A21C004 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 15:10:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.88.43] (pool-71-241-228-152.washdc.fios.verizon.net [71.241.228.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tetromino) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC5D933E5E4 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 15:10:55 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1443712250.20609.8.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] moving gcc-5.2 to unstable From: Alexandre Rostovtsev To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 11:10:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20151001142441.GN5374@vapier.lan> References: <20151001134947.GM5374@vapier.lan> <1443708682.20609.5.camel@gentoo.org> <20151001142441.GN5374@vapier.lan> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-4DcVVfa0iKJoQb1968Eo" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 7d5a404e-7f61-44fd-bc5d-a66728491375 X-Archives-Hash: 1cdb707471073070ba647283981e2a72 --=-4DcVVfa0iKJoQb1968Eo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 10:24 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 01 Oct 2015 10:11, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 09:49 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > what do people want to have in place before we move gcc-5.2 into > > > ~arch ? > >=20 > > For one thing, the fix for runtime failure in 64-bit wine: > >=20 > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D66838 > > https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=3Drevision&revision=3D225935 >=20 > did you file a bug for toolchain@ ? i'm not seeing one. > changes don't go in w/out a bug on our side. > -mike https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D549768 - now reassigned from wine to toolchain :) --=-4DcVVfa0iKJoQb1968Eo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.1 iQJ8BAABCgBmBQJWDUz6XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ1RTNCRkUzRDRBNkI2MEEwQkYwQzMyOEEx OEU1QjZGMkQ4RDVFQzhEAAoJEBjltvLY1eyN3UkQAIoqdawWpSNzMGnr+eIw6EMP crtgKm74So7mt1RFPCTx9/c31bMVm0dRfOSGW+rSdfer0mZ6cbWDwC85Cq1a7R/S UPyWBAdN+jLIS1lnIgRUiPCj6U9UN8zd6o+ei71YGXUyiCkyydSavDN6MjsurI17 WdI1/OI3htCLurWb6dnIRWK21BxYvILnQ/pFZSKv/bapqUcdDGUrto6z7PSd8/oq t1PFQ9nfOLFCsopZ7123ALkDNAKhp2DXGCmD1wujkiB37kIHb8oPZdmM9CWXnATN uf6D9F7OendeGadyndm+rKXG0mVwC3ndzWd2OsYh8F7btF2aYKGTomnKIhJEbxSU ojhOiHURjp5W1pDZJaK0HqNszdTR0zF2R2ao20Rgz4DRaA0mF1fW64eLZPh9anWN 8moqN3m27Aa99wjlQttmrPh+BLKje42RUjvw1HTxM4kYs7Ha2iG+//6D86xXYpy1 kCYNxXi5lm+bNHguPMHsu/NW3d+Xxb3jBgxVLIi9FNbhV5lrfUHePFWfdkRI4fAZ CraMqPvVxwfKnMUoPxaN1c9ERl0PNttgDfj850SpF7CGWfRSpb+KwjxGdAcUJ7E+ PLyg2pAy9RDW74/BI29z11cTedeqMS5C9GeeH8+xdSYbUcT8eyzDmXVHbwFZLHzB e8Y00+EWMwCraEe92UzN =D0eb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-4DcVVfa0iKJoQb1968Eo--