From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-70421-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA605138CCF
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 15 May 2015 08:51:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE16CE091A;
	Fri, 15 May 2015 08:51:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B33B6E090A
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 15 May 2015 08:51:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.34] (223.Red-83-53-45.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.53.45.223])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: pacho)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62F22340C76
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 15 May 2015 08:51:45 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1431679899.8576.2.camel@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Hey arch teams, we need your input!
From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 10:51:39 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20150428090720.GA118872@skade.schwarzvogel.de>
References: <201504112150.13880.dilfridge@gentoo.org>
	 <1430042363.29685.8.camel@gentoo.org>
	 <CAGfcS_=_hVDhfFCHZwz9ZVZQh7vFkcCqUbMhJqFLiFFrMEfVvw@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20150426182046.0ef76a2e@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net>
	 <20150428090720.GA118872@skade.schwarzvogel.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Archives-Salt: 62413861-42be-4a3c-ada0-1fe551dae71e
X-Archives-Hash: 9de7b967ffa958f9513c2bfad13c51c2

El mar, 28-04-2015 a las 11:07 +0200, Tobias Klausmann escribió:
[...]
> There is one corner case where that format is not enough:
> multiple ebuilds/versions with non-homogenic archs, i.e.:
> 
> cat-egory/packageA-1.2.3    amd64 x86 alpha
> cat-egory/packageB-2.3.9    amd64 alpha
> cat-egory/packageC-3.99     amd64 x86 ppc64
> cat-egory/packageD-10.2.5a  alpha
> 
> The format I used here seemes to be slightly more common than
> others and it is good enough for me™.
> 
> Any add-on prose should be _after_ the standardized bit.
> 

Yeah, we also use that format for gnome stuff... anyway, I don't mind
having a different option -> provide "list-${arch}" attachments with the
concrete lists per arch :/

Any preference?