From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8826F138A1A for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:53:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E8730E08CA; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E413E0885 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.34] (14.Red-2-137-247.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.247.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53483340702 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1424087606.27408.24.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-libs/libusbhp: ChangeLog Manifest libusbhp-1.0.2.ebuild metadata.xml From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 12:53:26 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1424087210.27408.22.camel@gentoo.org> References: <20141231052111.43F83E8B5@oystercatcher.gentoo.org> <3260120.GvFL1CnzYz@kailua> <20150216113951.GA4359@vapier> <1424087210.27408.22.camel@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: a4d4ebae-7d02-40da-8ac1-d1b1bc668cdc X-Archives-Hash: c76ffbb37417b4cd98e7a1a60a2f1579 El lun, 16-02-2015 a las 12:46 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > El lun, 16-02-2015 a las 06:39 -0500, Mike Frysinger escribió: > [...] > > Anyway, wouldn't have been much more useful for all to spend the effort > used in remove the package on simply fixing the header? :/ > > Ah, ok, I guess it's because of the "All rights reserved" http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-libs/libusbhp/libusbhp-1.0.2.ebuild?revision=1.1 In that case I agree removing the ebuild was the safest approach (even if a mail or a bug would have being nice to notify the committed about that error)