From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782731381FB for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 19:39:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B3CF121C10F; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 19:39:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F16321C07E for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 19:39:14 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :I3kQYkG6f/ML/Lb0bAYFCBt+SpICkd7E+UrA1ycmip9RDA+sU5X+JL1z/vOq/kqQB1Yr X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from porto.localnet (p5B313EE3.dip.t-dialin.net [91.49.62.227]) by smtp.strato.de (jorabe mo36) (RZmta 31.11 DYNA|AUTH) with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPA id x0623foBSHVBVC for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 20:39:13 +0100 (CET) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bad GPG key Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 20:40:21 +0100 Message-ID: <1423616.CkUWDIHDJr@porto> Organization: Gentoo Linux User-Agent: KMail/4.9.4 (Linux/3.5.7-gentoo; KDE/4.9.4; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <50DDF315.6030903@plaimi.net> References: <1356540147.20663.14.camel@localhost> <4908278.CVccqf12yr@porto> <50DDF315.6030903@plaimi.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1444531.flOxIONBUI"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Archives-Salt: 2cb29b38-9f3f-477b-a59e-62610bbb9f6f X-Archives-Hash: c195cdc96abe5d5acf9917946dc619d7 --nextPart1444531.flOxIONBUI Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Known kmail bug imho. :( https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306005 Am Freitag, 28. Dezember 2012, 20:29:25 schrieb Alexander Berntsen: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Why is your signature suddenly bad? It verifies in your 19:06 (GMT+1) > submission to gentoo-dev, but not in the most recent one -- 20:24 (GMT+1). > > - -- > Alexander > alexander@plaimi.net > http://plaimi.net/~alexander > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iF4EAREIAAYFAlDd8xUACgkQRtClrXBQc7VnPgD/dW6G8dEnSL5n8S+z/3k4PlTl > k3XmuGy+ACbwR7mxdg4A/32aKt/8qFeRlaQls4gTrIZ6yXNSbzoFFrdx0z1HAjtO > =WP4X > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ --nextPart1444531.flOxIONBUI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCgAGBQJQ3fWlAAoJEEb+UGWnxTyHvv8P/AyGleYld1+pg1bdEEJelPCL He/7IgJODShcDoWpLyVM98Vbq1BaYrTIdhNBzmvWYoYMsG0AdHdiNL1L7xkZ1mgZ Eyi1XQYHdj8XZLcUBrd0I9FBrLCZqdurP6qIu8WFvQ8PycR5tESInIa/dYVqj6Nd jHlJ0ceefusIJar0k5x5bB+l9mi6bOGyotGoUJ3MermqBL+xnElk/1QwpyspEu4X LeHLYZsODo4foR/0SNuOWAAIwQEPot1YTk8okMYLEqLgkclzMRPVpdff0n4vxhV9 7vHditqtoY6vgmMR0hEEKXDkIDs6GXXbcj94Iv6ZoG+GCkDd5RqssbakjuYIg4CI NRZtEwBTKt8UwlgX0DI62bjlrs3+LSS79AHQzJySujd/4clYZg01CgoICo9tJuj9 Jv2pl/6aQlL6/5ZVohCv1qOmyfePB/o6sz+CIjoP3eVNrYe9cft0gY4H4mplz0NC fgL74SmLpoPvLghp5I9SeMgA2aBZTjIqpbsN3WkGCvfmWRnW2CcvhbK0n0Tc4QD3 iJ7eRMj5CDEmLXAbcWTXDHk0Nxys5HZqpqZWbULwpd7eswJkG9rEtkHCGd4yhfO5 6pOuhNg2gxB+aJhu+PPXO63hlNqJrJ4if1BiBDJTKiwsAZfFjSra/Os3ocBFCf3A w5kXTen7md+pV1koyUNg =/TK3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1444531.flOxIONBUI--