From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-69106-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA4CF138A1A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:55:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D11DE08D9;
	Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:55:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B934E08BD
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:55:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.33] (21.Red-88-3-205.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [88.3.205.21])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: pacho)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4104C3406BF
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:55:27 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1421751319.1239.52.camel@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs
From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:55:19 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20150120112105.3f5c00ee@pc>
References: <20150120112105.3f5c00ee@pc>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.10 
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Archives-Salt: a3de45aa-1501-4ec7-b97f-376145f12b66
X-Archives-Hash: 27d05a43eff68c840a57fcf7cc712dd3

El mar, 20-01-2015 a las 11:21 +0100, Hanno Böck escribió:
[...]
> maintainer-wanted or if they're likely broken anyway just removed.

s/-wanted/-needed/ :)