* [gentoo-dev] Is gcc-4.7.0 going to be in portage tree anytime soon? @ 2012-04-17 13:36 kabel 2012-04-17 13:40 ` Agostino Sarubbo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: kabel @ 2012-04-17 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev Hello there, I just wanted to ask when an ebuild for gcc-4.7.0 will be in portage tree (unkeyworded, I suppose, like 4.6.0-4.6.2 are). Thank you. -- http://blackhole.sk/~kabel/ kabel <kabel@blackhole.sk> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Is gcc-4.7.0 going to be in portage tree anytime soon? 2012-04-17 13:36 [gentoo-dev] Is gcc-4.7.0 going to be in portage tree anytime soon? kabel @ 2012-04-17 13:40 ` Agostino Sarubbo 2012-04-17 14:54 ` Mike Frysinger 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Agostino Sarubbo @ 2012-04-17 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 386 bytes --] On Tuesday 17 April 2012 15:36:51 kabel wrote: > Hello there, I just wanted to ask when an ebuild for gcc-4.7.0 will be > in portage tree (unkeyworded, I suppose, like 4.6.0-4.6.2 are). > Thank you. You can just follow the version bump request: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409315 -- Agostino Sarubbo ago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison GPG: 0x7CD2DC5D [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Is gcc-4.7.0 going to be in portage tree anytime soon? 2012-04-17 13:40 ` Agostino Sarubbo @ 2012-04-17 14:54 ` Mike Frysinger 2012-04-17 15:22 ` kabel 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Mike Frysinger @ 2012-04-17 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 438 bytes --] On Tuesday 17 April 2012 09:40:22 Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > On Tuesday 17 April 2012 15:36:51 kabel wrote: > > Hello there, I just wanted to ask when an ebuild for gcc-4.7.0 will be > > in portage tree (unkeyworded, I suppose, like 4.6.0-4.6.2 are). > > You can just follow the version bump request: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409315 yes, please follow the bugs rather than posting to the gentoo-dev list -mike [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Is gcc-4.7.0 going to be in portage tree anytime soon? 2012-04-17 14:54 ` Mike Frysinger @ 2012-04-17 15:22 ` kabel 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: kabel @ 2012-04-17 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev Thank you. On 17.04.2012 16:54, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 17 April 2012 09:40:22 Agostino Sarubbo wrote: >> On Tuesday 17 April 2012 15:36:51 kabel wrote: >>> Hello there, I just wanted to ask when an ebuild for gcc-4.7.0 will be >>> in portage tree (unkeyworded, I suppose, like 4.6.0-4.6.2 are). >> >> You can just follow the version bump request: >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409315 > > yes, please follow the bugs rather than posting to the gentoo-dev list > -mike -- http://blackhole.sk/~kabel/ kabel <kabel@blackhole.sk> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-17 15:28 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-04-17 13:36 [gentoo-dev] Is gcc-4.7.0 going to be in portage tree anytime soon? kabel 2012-04-17 13:40 ` Agostino Sarubbo 2012-04-17 14:54 ` Mike Frysinger 2012-04-17 15:22 ` kabel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox