From: "J. Roeleveld" <joost@antarean.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eudev project announcement
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:10:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1410550.8z1d0Jc2Uc@eve> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121220093136.1dbd23f8@pomiocik.lan>
On Thursday, December 20, 2012 09:31:36 AM Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:27:26 +0100
>
> "J. Roeleveld" <joost@antarean.org> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 09:13:28 AM Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 08:21:36AM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > > On Mon, December 17, 2012 22:31, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 09:03:40PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > > >> Olav Vitters <olav@vitters.nl> wrote:
> > > > >> >On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 09:29:26AM -0500, Richard Yao wrote:
> > > > >> >> As I said in an earlier email, Lennart Poettering claims that it
> > > > >> >> does
> > > > >> >> not work. We are discussing some of the things necessary to make
> > > > >> >> it
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >work.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >Just to repeat:
> > > > >> >In this thread it was claimed that a separate /usr is not
> > > > >> >supported by
> > > > >> >systemd/udev.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >A case which works with latest systemd on various distributions. I
> > > > >> >checked with upstream (not Lennart), and they confirmed it works.
> > > > >> >I
> > > > >> >can
> > > > >> >wait for Lennart to say the same, but really not needed.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >I assume this will again turn into a "but I meant something else".
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Olav.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Lennart has stated that he considers a seperate /usr without init*
> > > > >> broken.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, as do I, and so do a lot of other developers.
> > > >
> > > > It is only "broken", because upstream decided to move everything into
> > > > /usr
> > > > that was previously in /.
> > >
> > > No, not at all, please see the web page that describes, in detail, the
> > > problems that has been going on for quite some time now, with the /usr
> > > and / partitions and packages.
> > >
> > > http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken
> > >
> > > One good solution to this issue is to move everything into /usr, and
> > > that's something that has wonderful benifits in the long run, and is
> > > something that I expect all Linux distros to eventually implement.
> > > Those that don't, will suffer because of it.
> > >
> > > Again, see the web page for why moving stuff into /usr is a good idea
> > > for the reasons behind this.
> > >
> > >
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseForTheUsrMerge
> >
> > Example: /usr Network Share
> > When /usr is on a network share, why not add a / on network as well?
> > I have multiple systems and as they all have different uses, they all have
> > different software installed.
> >
> > Example: Multiple Guest Operating Systems on the Same Host
> > See answer to previous example.
> >
> > How many environments actually currently exist where a shared /usr is
> > being
> > used?
>
> Are you aware that these environments are actually one of the most
> important reasons for moving everything to /usr? I don't know what
> hackery you're using to keep the systems in sync and working but it is
> braindead enough.
An init* needs to be kept in sync with the rest of the system as well. As that
is a compressed filesystem, it takes a lot more effort to keep that in sync in
comparison to a "normal" filesystem.
I consider having to write scripts to unpack, modify and repack an init* to be
more hackery then to keep a bootable root-filesystem working that can mount
all the filesystems needed for the whole environment.
Anything needed to mount /usr, /var, /run (and any other part needed for the
boot-process) should not be allowed to depend on anything in any of those
directories prior to those being mountable.
> The difference between keeping part of the system in rootfs
> and initramfs is that you can discard initramfs after using it. It can
> be anything which is enough to get the /usr mounted and system
> starting. Files on rootfs *have* to be in sync with those on /usr
> or you're getting random failures.
The same is true for an init*.
If an update of part of the OS leads to subtle changes in the filesystem where
older versions can no longer properly access them, the init* is broken.
--
Joost
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-21 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-15 3:52 [gentoo-dev] eudev project announcement Richard Yao
2012-12-15 3:57 ` Richard Yao
2012-12-15 4:16 ` Peter Stuge
2012-12-15 5:28 ` [gentoo-dev] " Nikos Chantziaras
2012-12-15 12:40 ` Rich Freeman
2012-12-15 6:33 ` [gentoo-dev] " Walter Dnes
2012-12-15 7:21 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2012-12-15 17:53 ` Walter Dnes
2012-12-15 18:07 ` Michał Górny
2012-12-15 18:58 ` Walter Dnes
2012-12-15 19:33 ` Michał Górny
2012-12-15 20:17 ` Richard Yao
2012-12-17 10:40 ` Olav Vitters
2012-12-17 11:09 ` Luca Barbato
2012-12-17 13:25 ` Olav Vitters
2012-12-17 14:29 ` Richard Yao
2012-12-17 19:48 ` Olav Vitters
2012-12-17 20:03 ` J. Roeleveld
2012-12-17 21:31 ` Greg KH
2012-12-17 23:23 ` William Hubbs
2012-12-18 6:50 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-12-18 18:45 ` William Hubbs
2012-12-18 18:51 ` Richard Yao
2012-12-18 19:06 ` William Hubbs
2012-12-18 19:20 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2012-12-18 19:28 ` Rich Freeman
2012-12-18 9:01 ` Richard Yao
2012-12-18 18:07 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2012-12-18 7:21 ` J. Roeleveld
2012-12-19 17:13 ` Greg KH
2012-12-19 17:41 ` Kevin Chadwick
2012-12-19 23:27 ` J. Roeleveld
2012-12-20 8:31 ` Michał Górny
2012-12-20 11:21 ` Richard Yao
2012-12-20 12:02 ` Rich Freeman
2012-12-20 12:18 ` Richard Yao
2012-12-20 20:55 ` Kevin Chadwick
2012-12-21 8:23 ` J. Roeleveld
2012-12-21 8:10 ` J. Roeleveld [this message]
2012-12-21 8:57 ` Michał Górny
2012-12-21 10:24 ` J. Roeleveld
2012-12-21 11:02 ` Michał Górny
2012-12-21 11:31 ` J. Roeleveld
2012-12-21 11:42 ` Michał Górny
2012-12-21 11:48 ` J. Roeleveld
2012-12-21 16:12 ` Stelian Ionescu
2012-12-21 16:14 ` J. Roeleveld
2012-12-21 13:51 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2012-12-21 14:37 ` J. Roeleveld
2012-12-21 14:52 ` Dale
2012-12-21 14:54 ` J. Roeleveld
2012-12-21 15:06 ` Dale
2012-12-21 14:38 ` Rich Freeman
2012-12-21 15:04 ` J. Roeleveld
2012-12-21 16:21 ` William Hubbs
2012-12-21 17:36 ` J. Roeleveld
2012-12-21 17:52 ` Dale
2012-12-21 18:05 ` J. Roeleveld
2012-12-21 18:15 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2012-12-21 18:20 ` William Hubbs
2012-12-21 18:52 ` J. Roeleveld
2012-12-18 8:51 ` Richard Yao
2012-12-18 5:12 ` Luca Barbato
2012-12-17 12:47 ` Richard Yao
2012-12-15 23:32 ` Duncan
2012-12-15 14:19 ` [gentoo-dev] " Anthony G. Basile
2012-12-15 21:08 ` Richard Yao
2012-12-15 21:20 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2012-12-15 21:22 ` Richard Yao
2012-12-15 12:07 ` Roy Bamford
2012-12-15 12:47 ` Dale
2012-12-15 12:48 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] " Rich Freeman
2012-12-15 13:52 ` Duncan
2012-12-15 15:43 ` Luca Barbato
2012-12-15 16:20 ` Rich Freeman
2012-12-15 20:29 ` Luca Barbato
2012-12-15 21:16 ` Richard Yao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1410550.8z1d0Jc2Uc@eve \
--to=joost@antarean.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox