From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-66894-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D23713877A for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:33:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A2840E0D1B; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:33:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BADDCE0D0B for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:33:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.223] (113.139.217.87.dynamic.jazztel.es [87.217.139.113]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6878033FFC8 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1406381623.20388.46.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:33:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: <slrnlt763f.9i1.martin@epidot.math.uni-rostock.de> References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org> <53CD6D1F.3030609@gentoo.org> <20140722235632.2c586b34@gentoo.org> <slrnlt763f.9i1.martin@epidot.math.uni-rostock.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: a3b7499e-5f8a-4ccd-8b3b-81e655039c38 X-Archives-Hash: 8f5a07c882faebb946cbc9763d68f715 El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 12:00 +0000, Martin Vaeth escribió: [...] > Probably there are many more examples than 1.-4, but I hope > that the point becomes clear: Whenever packages split, merge, > or can substitute each other, dependency changes are necessary, > and rebuilds caused by these are unnecessary. > > Unfortunately, such things happen *very* frequently... > > Nobody is to blame for this; the PM just should be ready > to deal with such situations without unnecessary rebuilds, > be it by dynamic deps or by a mechanism to avoid > recompilation. > I have also seen the need of add slots to DEPEND/RDEPEND due the inclusion of an updated package like gstreamer:1.0/gtk+:3/libpng... or needing to add forgotten USE deps (like package[introspection?] or package[X]).