From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-66242-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8998713877A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 09:48:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E80AE0CFA;
	Mon, 16 Jun 2014 09:48:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A69B3E0A62
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 09:48:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.33] (198.Red-2-137-229.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.229.198])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: pacho)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C885340055
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 09:48:03 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1402912078.2466.8.camel@belkin5>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on
 any ABI changes?
From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:47:58 +0200
In-Reply-To: <1402764656.16949.7.camel@rook>
References: <20140614164151.45afb5ca@pomiot.lan>
	 <1402764656.16949.7.camel@rook>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.3 
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Archives-Salt: 42855e0c-ec14-4869-822c-8a2a909fc00a
X-Archives-Hash: 5cfef4da3a70bd97087ffe9730fd7c39

El sáb, 14-06-2014 a las 12:50 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió:
[...]
> A solution to unnecessary rebuilds in these situations, as well as for
> case (1), might be in the form of subslots as a key:value list, with
> different users subscribing to be rebuilt for specific keys.

I guess https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462138 will interest you
too :)