From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C68413877A for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 674D1E0AE0; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7459FE0AC2 for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rook (unknown [96.241.16.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tetromino) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6DA0933FE5F for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:51:44 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1402761029.16949.1.camel@rook> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? From: Alexandre Rostovtsev To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 11:50:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140614161341.6cc4c2fa@googlemail.com> References: <20140614164151.45afb5ca@pomiot.lan> <20140614161341.6cc4c2fa@googlemail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-X7l4RYb+YddZa1ZMJTJ3" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 5f2c4fe5-30e2-4043-b04c-74e61032837d X-Archives-Hash: b00e8482fb28e10be74ac86465dbf739 --=-X7l4RYb+YddZa1ZMJTJ3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2014-06-14 at 16:13 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:41:51 +0200 > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > However, this means that we force much more rebuilds than necessary. >=20 > This shouldn't be considered to be a problem. This would be suicide for Gentoo as a distro. Organizations that have a dedicated build server and a standardized /etc/portage config tree pushed to all user machines could rebuild half of @world once a week. Individual users running Gentoo on a single workstation or server can't and won't. --=-X7l4RYb+YddZa1ZMJTJ3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABAgAGBQJTnG9MAAoJEKRDAQ9PHUhg4CoQAJViICoH0bHsR4Xi+wfjQRDO 3SzK4gevQCcKtx0zjXyovm31oVB5BzeWYLts9FoFSpBsgjyP4+k3q4LIWL1mfT5P Sr4OFsWSE9hHRQQeipKYUBu2E9qPJoS4a1X/EozhjoUMsiMsyMyKlN+kpxzXpL0s 1jvxNGwq0PbwwwALeioKyJ6vMQdBZqwy803sT++I9W2+aAIz9vM6gQWPJ/MO5I1e S8kvlpT8SjHrsHUVhk+lnwMcuF71TYezuM4dFwOZGAHb0C0CSKFp09SuVBW2P1A4 srzi/mwO0PNM+c4piNddrO0aCoah5qI/vDVVdpkTTynM8ZJH7mpAx+eRQtNWZpuL +cyuh2iLUYnl1ydcxbAez6ftKZGZMefa9nfPraHuIm2ZMwey0qalex0P3a8khN2X fT1VMxl24AgYdI5kHtzbwi3d453e/fcLqHqfOeZokqmDoANCBXqQQhiUg8WSZvDR 98yxsMx8+7OQWfMtoTGkUJQkz1DBEtmGLlCpINL3UVnjFxnjG33CytpMGVpxuDmP gsIZwQOJN5VWvTPDr3pilvKZmQ4yhuhC+9qF6zNSqC3/g2sjL8mQeNtsBaOeEJXR xv859wfKdvpxLJlM1jvrr8hZUyklFf0I3vyuH6CbsX9+vw+4H9JGodMLTqYdwGN8 JjjeuVrO998Oc8ixXIlv =1MpV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-X7l4RYb+YddZa1ZMJTJ3--