public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jesús Guerrero" <i92guboj@terra.es>
To: <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Init systems portage category
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:44:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <13ecafe4c66b8ddaf0c70ef84ecb62b8@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <deaa866a0910121052k47a5ae5bg45bdfdd2b5f98124@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:52:49 -0400, Robert Bradbury
<robert.bradbury@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree with Wyatt's point.
> 
> Wouldn't there be an easy way to reset the last access date on all of
the
> files to say 1/1/2009 on a system then execute a relatively robust
> multi-user boot (and maybe a world emerge upgrade) and record which
files
> are actually used during that process, then determine which package they
> belong to and label those with some "level of criticality"?

In my opinion, if we really want to speak about a way to implement that
kind of snapshoting, we should start thinking about providing a better
integration with lvm, from the root. lvm can take care of the snapshots on
a non-expensive way, and it would be relatively easy to implement. However
a lot of stuff would need to be re-documented, starting from the handbook,
and the init system.

Into my eyes, it's the only serious way to do this at least until btrfs is
ready for the masses, and there's a long way until we reach that point
still.

As for the package bits, it's true that the semantic and delimitation
about what's part of the system and what isn't, and the mechanism to handle
some things could be better, but I've grown accustomed to the way it is and
I really don't care if that changes or not.
-- 
Jesús Guerrero



  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-12 19:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-12 15:39 [gentoo-dev] Init systems portage category Victor Ostorga
2009-10-12 16:45 ` Robert Bradbury
2009-10-12 16:51   ` Jesús Guerrero
2009-10-12 17:06     ` Wyatt Epp
2009-10-12 17:42     ` Robert Bradbury
2009-10-12 17:52       ` Robert Bradbury
2009-10-12 18:44         ` Jesús Guerrero [this message]
2009-10-12 23:53           ` Richard Freeman
2009-10-13  7:21             ` Tobias Klausmann
2009-10-13  7:42 ` Thilo Bangert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=13ecafe4c66b8ddaf0c70ef84ecb62b8@localhost \
    --to=i92guboj@terra.es \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox