From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-16246-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 26240 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2004 11:35:00 +0000
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197)
  by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 1 Oct 2004 11:35:00 +0000
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41)
	id 1CDLgh-0000e5-Rq
	for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 11:34:59 +0000
Received: (qmail 7608 invoked by uid 89); 1 Oct 2004 11:34:59 +0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 11166 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2004 11:34:59 +0000
Message-ID: <13cc2f7804100104346f5f5be9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:34:58 -0400
From: Colin Kingsley <ckingsley@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Colin Kingsley <ckingsley@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <200410011048.33786.luke-jr@utopios.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <41586F16.5020409@gentoo.org> <20040930225720.GA24975@tompayne.org>
	 <415CCA06.8060206@gentoo.org> <200410011048.33786.luke-jr@utopios.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: removing dhcpcd from system???
X-Archives-Salt: a0099d7c-9947-4ad2-b5d7-025183282085
X-Archives-Hash: 605295b81bab0a31f34e106254f8b718

On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 03:16:42 +0000, Luke-Jr <luke-jr@utopios.org> wrote:
> On Friday 01 October 2004 3:07 am, Travis Tilley wrote:
> > so yeah... the only reason why the next livecds will work with dhcp is
> > because the livecd team ACCIDENTALLY found out about this change.
> Sounds like when I stumbled upon finding that bootstrap.sh was old and
> broken... Docs team was never notified, not sure if they've even got the
> handbook updated for it yet.

Yea.... speaking of bootstrap.sh, why is it broken and whats
bootstrap2.6.sh and those other bootstrap scripts I've seen?

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list