From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1082A138A1F for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 20:26:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33FC9E0B24; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 20:26:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 492BCE0B1E for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 20:26:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (132.Red-2-137-63.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.63.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9718B33FFE0 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 20:26:30 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1396988787.2061.35.camel@belkin5> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Some tarballs still ship broken .png images that can't be viewed with libpng16, "Tracker" bug #468386 From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 22:26:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: <53444D1C.2070600@gentoo.org> References: <5343F64D.9060802@gentoo.org> <1396985171.2061.33.camel@belkin5> <53444D1C.2070600@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 3fc11d81-8954-4b67-9333-809c07108de5 X-Archives-Hash: 6b8050f24f0e75251a64948d6a4316a5 El mar, 08-04-2014 a las 22:25 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: > On 08/04/14 22:26, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > El mar, 08-04-2014 a las 16:14 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: > >> It would take considerably amount of time to start extracting tarballs, > >> installing ebuilds, and reporting bugs about possible > >> broken .png files within packages. > >> The problem is broken IDAT lenght, an error that libpng15 still > >> gracefully ignored, but libpng16 no longer ignores. > >> > >> The bug, http://bugs.gentoo.org/468386 > >> List created by Tobias at 2013 May, > >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=347306 > >> > >> > >> This has been discussed on the ML before, and most important packages > >> got already fixed, but there are packages still > >> left. Any help addressing the issue is welcome, and I'm sending this > >> mail in hopes people will see packages on the lists > >> that intrest them, and fix them. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Samuli > >> > >> > > If there exists a tool that detects that broken png files, maybe a QA > > portage check (like the one used to detect broken .desktop files) could > > be added to help to detect and fix the problematic images :/ > > > > > > Pretty good idea, there is the script in python, and Portage is python, > maybe it can be adopted somehow. > > The script is at, https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466190#c11 > > - Samuli > Probably we will need to open a bug report, do you prefer to report that one or should I? ;)