From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-65287-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DEF1392EF for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52EF4E09B9; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:17:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F427E07BA for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:17:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.88.43] (unknown [96.241.16.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tetromino) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BA7A33F5B2 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:17:38 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1394637399.7647.8.camel@rook> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Make udev optional in net-wireless/bluez? From: Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetromino@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 11:16:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140312132405.4330.qmail@stuge.se> References: <531BD08F.1000003@gentoo.org> <1394333701.20819.5.camel@lightboat.digis.net> <531D2FDB.5080303@gentoo.org> <1394430333.22096.27.camel@lightboat.digis.net> <1394434756.22096.44.camel@lightboat.digis.net> <531D7C72.7020709@gentoo.org> <531D8C2F.20807@gentoo.org> <531D9A92.5000706@gentoo.org> <20140310182725.7813467e@pomiot.lan> <1394494189.29514.9.camel@kanae> <20140312132405.4330.qmail@stuge.se> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-UGbchNUtHgPDdJ6k6Z9b" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 645eb5f8-dee1-471b-9d60-e472ceb1ee50 X-Archives-Hash: 908fa148475d23096a19c320fc79d8ec --=-UGbchNUtHgPDdJ6k6Z9b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 14:24 +0100, Peter Stuge wrote: > Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > > Making udev dependency always on is a deliberate choice here >=20 > I thought Gentoo was about users having choice? Sad face. Gentoo is usually about the maintainer's choice ;) So in the end it's up to Pacho: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D504324 --=-UGbchNUtHgPDdJ6k6Z9b Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJTIHpeAAoJEKRDAQ9PHUhgM0YP/1oxj1qIDC6Yr9wziXWZuKHP bVoXgU3kwvAbtqB2bK8DvVvdcYzWFnp6IDkZ7By1mFQcKyD2NCrwRj7+LyaGgtjo Y5aGMtfwOHK7iob0+5okSnI1E/hmFNzU7+LEPwpQKCIomNy4BhkA4Vr0b3JtgoGR Y0RcmEiFGh8NYtQt/fRQwYIDYVeK6eLIItImaqRttb8T3Z+NTzEKpk755vcbonfo oPx/UM19sbCFw9urtCHOr2KUU81ZTX/7EAQexFN1+m6CBnkzzf6/sbbqmSN+wvqF CbXKJivFPaL0zkAKj0DksOR5RWFeyZSM0TluqnaptFvsWnBaAj7AnIIT1ztnL2n3 +xdOm6l9Ho36VPql7ftTHNWjvmICLdJ3vslQqn598HJV8bJuRtUkk3LA1gTf7PmA 7p4/hT8GhA0M+yJfYHVRxNS+1LRwrgv7NMMsR3oA3G+N69t8GWUxxsYvb2kaE3bX DwUku0LdVmJRfIGIprILjy6bqIYnJB4rrEFJW1YzEkOef2t1KNAEF9YUgmSh5sp5 QQzPgy+6iSdY0DtlkmzU12dysbloWIUTs3LO3JMCzSfiaJjoWsgAAapg/mFWsIx3 Zb1m1Hvov9xMD70IPvMCvDUpcNQY0QFfsKEfWRgjVHtFtAzYl4nP88zaQVA8K8J4 cm079B0L22nWHYMEhzmd =ERS/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-UGbchNUtHgPDdJ6k6Z9b--