From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-65287-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DEF1392EF
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:17:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52EF4E09B9;
	Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:17:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F427E07BA
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:17:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.88.43] (unknown [96.241.16.8])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: tetromino)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BA7A33F5B2
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:17:38 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1394637399.7647.8.camel@rook>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Make udev optional in net-wireless/bluez?
From: Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetromino@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 11:16:39 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20140312132405.4330.qmail@stuge.se>
References: <531BD08F.1000003@gentoo.org>
	 <1394333701.20819.5.camel@lightboat.digis.net>
	 <531D2FDB.5080303@gentoo.org>
	 <1394430333.22096.27.camel@lightboat.digis.net>
	 <1394434756.22096.44.camel@lightboat.digis.net>
	 <531D7C72.7020709@gentoo.org> <531D8C2F.20807@gentoo.org>
	 <531D9A92.5000706@gentoo.org> <20140310182725.7813467e@pomiot.lan>
	 <1394494189.29514.9.camel@kanae> <20140312132405.4330.qmail@stuge.se>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-UGbchNUtHgPDdJ6k6Z9b"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Archives-Salt: 645eb5f8-dee1-471b-9d60-e472ceb1ee50
X-Archives-Hash: 908fa148475d23096a19c320fc79d8ec


--=-UGbchNUtHgPDdJ6k6Z9b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 14:24 +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> > Making udev dependency always on is a deliberate choice here
>=20
> I thought Gentoo was about users having choice? Sad face.

Gentoo is usually about the maintainer's choice ;)

So in the end it's up to Pacho:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D504324

--=-UGbchNUtHgPDdJ6k6Z9b
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=ERS/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-UGbchNUtHgPDdJ6k6Z9b--