From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620AF1392EC for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 02:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 43298E0AB1; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 02:54:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56D9FE0AA5 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 02:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.3.149] (63-248-158-21.static.layl0102.digis.net [63.248.158.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tetromino) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 894D833FAD6 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 02:54:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1394333701.20819.5.camel@lightboat.digis.net> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Make udev optional in net-wireless/bluez? From: Alexandre Rostovtsev To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2014 21:55:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: <531BD08F.1000003@gentoo.org> References: <531BD08F.1000003@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 2a156f68-709b-4f5f-afa3-62b06140d364 X-Archives-Hash: ffecaa5c3e121362a4436163d0556b54 On Sat, 2014-03-08 at 21:23 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote: > So I want to try and play around with a particular network domination tool > on my home network, Omphalos. However, its current configure script has a > hard dependency on bluetooth.h, part of the net-wireless/bluez package. > > Currently, net-wireless/bluez has a harddep on virtual/udev, which works > great if you use either udev or eudev. I'm using busybox's mdev instead, so > the logic of the bluez ebuild needs some changes: [...] > Thoughts on this? Does mdev have any API which is equivalent to libudev's hwdb? See http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/libudev/libudev-udev-hwdb.html If yes, then optimal solution would be to patch bluez to allow using mdev's hwdb support, and get the patch upstreamed :)