From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24DC138247 for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:01:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DCD27E0CD0; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:01:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB35EE0C48 for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:01:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (2.Red-2-136-126.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.136.126.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82DE233F725 for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:01:32 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1389438089.1141.20.camel@belkin5> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 12:01:29 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52D1237C.50307@gentoo.org> References: <1386598800.12112.7.camel@belkin5> <201401091521.00050.vapier@gentoo.org> <201401101720.09944.vapier@gentoo.org> <52D1237C.50307@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: e437d9b9-7034-4602-bb70-53a4fe185151 X-Archives-Hash: da8642d23a9e154c9c9626a46c5d134e El sáb, 11-01-2014 a las 10:57 +0000, Markos Chandras escribió: > On 01/10/2014 11:14 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > > On 10 January 2014 22:20, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > >> how would moving it to base-system make any difference ? people doing it > >> wrong > >> wouldn't really care which herd pam itself is owned by. > >> > > > > I'm not saying it makes a difference, sorry I didn't make it clear. > > > > > > Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes > > flameeyes@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ > > > I only suggested that as part of our usual 'drop-dead-teams' process in > the retirement team. So in this case, either a 'parent' herd needs to > inherit the packages or simply drop them to maintainer-needed > sys-auth/pam-pgsql sys-auth/pam_dotfile sys-auth/pam_krb5 sys-auth/pam_ldap sys-auth/pam_passwdqc sys-auth/pam_ssh sys-auth/pam_ssh_agent_auth sys-auth/pambase sys-libs/pam virtual/pam This are the packages under pam team management, would be nice to know if there is somebody maintaining each of them or we need new maintainer for any Thanks