From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D5113827E for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 16:39:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CD30E0B11; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 16:39:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from regula.xs4me.net (regula.xs4me.net [94.228.209.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77C2AE0B0C for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 16:39:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:610:61a:0:5a94:6bff:febb:71e4] (unknown [IPv6:2001:610:61a:0:5a94:6bff:febb:71e4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by regula.xs4me.net (Sendmail 4.5.1) with ESMTPSA id 32FD9143871 for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:39:47 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <1386434385.16533.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] =net-fs/samba-4* vs. dev-libs/openssl[kerberos] From: lists To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 17:39:45 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20131206162435.7cc53c6c@shanghai.paradoxon.rec> References: <20131206162435.7cc53c6c@shanghai.paradoxon.rec> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 557e976e-339e-4dc9-9bbe-f2173dbe6994 X-Archives-Hash: 32a03f584bcd0eed18ce32292886bb2d Lars Wendler schreef op vr 06-12-2013 om 16:24 [+0100]: > Hi list, > > in [1] we got a bug where was pointed out that it is impossible to use > =net-fs/samba-4* on a system which has dev-libs/openssl[kerberos] > installed. > > Long story short, samba-4 hard requires app-crypt/heimdal while > openssl[kerberos] hard requires app-crypt/mit-krb5. Of course both > packages are mutually exclusive as both are their own kerberos > implementation. > > The bug reporter suggests to use bundled heimdal from samba-4 which I > would like to avoid if possible. > If anyone knows some better solution please speak up. It is highly > appreciated. > > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/490872 > > > Kind regards Hi Lars, how about enabling the existing mit-krb5 support in Samba? Patch attached to the bug report. regards, Jorg