From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8031381F3 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 18:11:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53527E0A95; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 18:11:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DACCE0A8D for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 18:11:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (72.Red-2-137-36.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.36.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A994733EE83; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 18:11:39 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1381342296.3326.8.camel@belkin5> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] afterstep herd is empty From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, desktop-wm Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 20:11:36 +0200 In-Reply-To: <52559856.1040408@gentoo.org> References: <7135f622d31793b3c1e5ad1e1a0fa0be@cafarelli.fr> <1381339215.3326.1.camel@belkin5> <525593B3.6050407@gentoo.org> <1381340560.3326.6.camel@belkin5> <52559856.1040408@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: df7d09f6-5440-4216-8e7e-dcb039da8ced X-Archives-Hash: f4f144ee5efbc7e9b6f44a3117902deb El mié, 09-10-2013 a las 20:54 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: [...] > I meant that for long as desktop-wm@ herd is there, it should be used > > But you have a very good point, the desktop-wm@ herd has been quiet for > years and it's one of those herds that doesn't make sense because no > maintainer can run all of the WMs the herd pretends to maintain > So I would go for removing the herd altogether, WMs should have > individual maintainers > I fully agree, will proceed in a week with both then. Also, CCing desktop-wm alias here and, if you want to maintain something under that herd, please get it (and remove the herd from metadata to save me from doing that work in all the packages ;)) sys-libs/libixp x11-misc/bbappconf x11-misc/bbcd x11-misc/bbdate x11-misc/bbkeys x11-misc/bblaunch x11-misc/bbmail x11-misc/bbpager x11-misc/bbppp x11-misc/bbrun x11-misc/bbsload x11-misc/bbtime x11-misc/bbweather x11-misc/fbdesk x11-misc/fbpager x11-misc/fluxter x11-misc/ftmenu x11-misc/netwmpager x11-misc/obconf x11-misc/obmenu x11-misc/oroborus-desklaunch x11-misc/oroborus-deskmenu x11-misc/oroborus-keylaunch x11-misc/peksystray x11-misc/wmctrl x11-plugins/docker x11-themes/commonbox-styles-extra x11-themes/commonbox-styles x11-themes/fluxbox-styles-fluxmod x11-themes/fvwm-themes x11-themes/fvwm_icons x11-themes/fvwm_sounds x11-themes/iceicons x11-themes/icewm-themes x11-themes/wm-icons x11-wm/aewm++ x11-wm/aewm x11-wm/amiwm x11-wm/blackbox x11-wm/ctwm x11-wm/dwm x11-wm/echinus x11-wm/evilwm x11-wm/fluxbox x11-wm/fvwm x11-wm/i3 x11-wm/icewm x11-wm/jwm x11-wm/larswm x11-wm/lwm x11-wm/matwm2 x11-wm/openbox x11-wm/oroborus x11-wm/pekwm x11-wm/plwm x11-wm/ratpoison x11-wm/selectwm x11-wm/sithwm x11-wm/spectrwm x11-wm/treewm x11-wm/vtwm x11-wm/windowlab x11-wm/wm2 x11-wm/wmii