From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-61960-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6A21381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri,  9 Aug 2013 11:38:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A8C96E0CCC;
	Fri,  9 Aug 2013 11:38:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4630E0C6E
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  9 Aug 2013 11:38:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.37] (121.Red-2-137-48.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.48.121])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: pacho)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6656D33EBA1
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  9 Aug 2013 11:38:39 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1376048315.7236.18.camel@localhost>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8
From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 13:38:35 +0200
In-Reply-To: <5204D4DC.30108@gentoo.org>
References: 
	<CAN3AtvptsvfUz=AoC7VqVjV7fFo9qnSO0VY6hX3qWTK6BLatEw@mail.gmail.com>
	 <5203A880.1050306@gentoo.org>
	 <CANSUr=+20f-AR5LhzoCP3-Xqi-78O8158DqeFm3CUmjDAPN2uQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <5203B190.80306@gentoo.org> <20130808172340.7d2424af@TOMWIJ-GENTOO>
	 <5203C908.1000304@gentoo.org> <20130808185357.4208db83@TOMWIJ-GENTOO>
	 <CAGfcS_mBnrPdC9ndjVyhx3wXwtpA2DpB5n8ymk+9_7F-7n40SQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAOazyz0j0=zGsfxR3czFJJ5-SpsH-9c4SkTf3N1LFx2aZytc4g@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20130808202627.4b474471@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20130809020303.GA11215@linux1>
	 <1376033807.30224.21.camel@kanae> <5204B6A9.1080309@gentoo.org>
	 <CAGfcS_=zviZvLAPfLg+2op9dUmsK=WAheE=2UeOMcnqWTyv8Gg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <5204D30A.703@gentoo.org> <20130809132622.70e67d5c@TOMWIJ-GENTOO>
	 <5204D4DC.30108@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4 
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Archives-Salt: 449c7932-12ab-471e-9d07-17aa2b10c432
X-Archives-Hash: be8f4551e4053a619d89f88437a953a9

El vie, 09-08-2013 a las 19:39 +0800, Patrick Lauer escribió:
> On 08/09/2013 07:26 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 19:31:22 +0800
> > Patrick Lauer <patrick@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > 
> >> You just removed the upgrade path for users.
> > 
> > The upgrade path is to install systemd or to implement openrc support.
> > 
> Invalid upgrade path.
> 
> "The upgrade path is to install Fedora" is about as reasonable, and also
> not acceptable.
> 
> 

The upgrade path is to run systemd, not migrate to fedora. As simply as
such