From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E1AA1381F3 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 06:29:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94D5BE0C14; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 06:29:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C49CFE0C0B for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 06:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.34] (130.Red-2-137-19.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.19.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9135833E94D for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 06:29:02 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1376029738.7236.9.camel@localhost> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8 From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 08:28:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <52047E1C.5060902@gentoo.org> References: <5202416C.5@gentoo.org> <52043707.7030005@gentoo.org> <52047E1C.5060902@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 4b7fa22a-6a0f-421b-b010-64f466159552 X-Archives-Hash: d981ab3c2f77a86d7a8c6232d2ee0b9a El vie, 09-08-2013 a las 08:29 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: > On 09/08/13 03:25, Michael Weber wrote: > > Citing from Pachos blog, > > > > "[...] we are now forcing people to *run* systemd to be able to properly > > run Gnome 3.8, otherwise power management and multiseat support are > > lost, [...]" [1]. > > > > Pacho, would you accept patches and USE flags to make gdm an optional > > component to gnome virtual? Power management is not crucial for window > > management. > > > > [1] > > http://my.opera.com/pacho/blog/2013/07/24/gnome-3-8-requiring-systemd-on-gentoo > > > > > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=242750 > > Quoting: > > "Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2008-10-19 15:13:07 EEST > > Currently, I am mainly (there are other apps that I prefer not install > in all systems but adding a USE flag for each of them would be excesive) > using gnome-light instead of gnome ebuild because I don't want to > install vinagre and vino in my systems and, in some of them, I don't > install evolution (bacause users that will use affected system use > thunderbird instead of evo) > > I have seen that there are already USE flags for these apps in > /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc : > evo - Adds support for mail-client/evolution > vnc - Enable VNC (remote desktop viewer) support > > Then, I seems reasonable (at least for me) use this global USE flags for > not forcing people to install evolution and vnc related apps > > Thanks a lot" > > ;-) > > Please open a *new* bug suggesting this change -> I agree with it, but needs to be considered by the rest of gnome team :) Thanks