From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 17:16:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1375888590.1870.6.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5202416C.5@gentoo.org>
El mié, 07-08-2013 a las 14:45 +0200, Michael Weber escribió:
> Greetings,
>
> Gnome Herd decided to target stablilization of 3.8 [1] which requires
> systemd.
>
> What are the reasons to stable 3.8 and not 3.6, a version w/o this
> restriction, enabling all non systemd users to profit from this
> eye-candy as well.
>
> I raise the freedom of choice card here. And deliberately choosing an
> uncooperative version doesn't shine a good light.
>
> Facts, pls!
>
> Michael
>
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478252
Gnome 3.6 is not maintained by upstream now -> bugs are being fixed in
3.8 and 3.9. Also, stabilizing 3.6 will point Gnome2 users to this two
options:
- Run gnome-shell
- Run 3.6 fallback mode -> 3.6 fallback mode is using old gnome-panel
stuff that was dropped in 3.8 because it wasn't really maintained
They will also be able to run 3.6 with openrc... but that will be the
last version "working" with it, we will hit the same problem again when
we want to stabilize 3.8 (well, 3.10 is going to be released in October,
I think we have been waiting enough)
Also, I think we should stop spending a lot of time trying to keep it
working with openrc, we simply don't have resources to do that at the
moment (even Debian/Ubuntu people are stick with systemd-204 because
they don't have resources to keep logind working without systemd in
newer versions). Now, we are needing to put a lot of effort on trying to
provide unit files and provide systemd related fixes in the tree because
we haven't (in general) pay attention to systemd at all => I think we
should put more efforts on it than trying to work on hacks to prevent
systemd dependency.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-07 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 192+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-07 12:45 [gentoo-dev] Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8 Michael Weber
2013-08-07 13:14 ` Alexandre Rostovtsev
2013-08-07 13:56 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-07 15:22 ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-07 23:49 ` Patrick Lauer
2013-08-08 2:51 ` Alex Alexander
2013-08-08 9:29 ` hasufell
2013-08-08 9:43 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-08 11:19 ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-08 11:28 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-08 10:05 ` Michał Górny
2013-08-08 10:30 ` Samuli Suominen
2013-08-08 14:01 ` Fabio Erculiani
2013-08-08 14:10 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2013-08-08 14:30 ` Fabio Erculiani
2013-08-08 14:45 ` Michał Górny
2013-08-08 14:17 ` Patrick Lauer
2013-08-08 14:34 ` Ben Kohler
2013-08-08 14:56 ` hasufell
2013-08-08 15:16 ` Damien Levac
2013-08-08 15:40 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2013-08-08 15:49 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-08 15:56 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-08-08 16:02 ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-08 16:13 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-08-08 16:20 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2013-08-08 16:24 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-08-08 16:58 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2013-08-09 13:10 ` Walter Dnes
2013-08-08 15:23 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-08 16:36 ` hasufell
2013-08-08 16:48 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-08-08 16:52 ` hasufell
2013-08-08 17:09 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-08-08 17:57 ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-08 16:53 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-08 17:41 ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-08 17:57 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2013-08-08 18:08 ` Samuli Suominen
2013-08-08 18:23 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2013-08-08 18:47 ` Multiple implementations shouldn't block Gentoo's progress. Stabilize package combinations? (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8) Tom Wijsman
[not found] ` < CAOazyz2R+3TANLkeoXhP0LgLS+rOZwjPdCYVdC82DTG1nbri-w@mail.gmail.com>
2013-08-08 18:57 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2013-08-08 19:09 ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-08 19:11 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-09 1:05 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Multiple implementations shouldn't block Gentoo's progress. Stabilize package combinations? Zac Medico
2013-08-09 1:18 ` Dustin C. Hatch
2013-08-09 5:39 ` Samuli Suominen
2013-08-09 6:42 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steven J. Long
2013-08-09 6:51 ` [gentoo-dev] [typo] Re: Re: Multiple implementations shouldn't block Gentoo's progress Steven J. Long
2013-08-09 7:19 ` William Hubbs
2013-08-09 7:26 ` Samuli Suominen
2013-08-09 10:50 ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-10 18:42 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steven J. Long
2013-08-11 1:53 ` Rich Freeman
[not found] ` < CAGfcS_=zyeX8Whr8U4w4s3ouSbUoTm=hF95t3rd0q=wt60eZcQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` < 20130810184211.GA1500@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk>
2013-08-11 2:04 ` Duncan
2013-08-09 8:46 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Multiple implementations shouldn't block Gentoo's progress. Stabilize package combinations? Tom Wijsman
2013-08-09 8:58 ` Samuli Suominen
2013-08-09 9:53 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-08 18:58 ` [gentoo-dev] Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8 Samuli Suominen
2013-08-08 19:01 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2013-08-08 18:26 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-08 18:38 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2013-08-08 19:03 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-08 19:02 ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-08 19:22 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-09 2:03 ` William Hubbs
2013-08-09 7:36 ` Gilles Dartiguelongue
2013-08-09 9:30 ` hasufell
2013-08-09 10:27 ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-09 11:31 ` Patrick Lauer
2013-08-09 11:26 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-09 11:39 ` Patrick Lauer
2013-08-09 11:38 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-08-09 12:14 ` vivo75
2013-08-09 13:54 ` Michał Górny
2013-08-09 16:38 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2013-08-10 19:57 ` vivo75
2013-08-09 16:17 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2013-08-09 20:43 ` Samuli Suominen
2013-08-09 11:45 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-09 13:57 ` Michał Górny
2013-08-09 19:11 ` Ben de Groot
2013-08-09 19:15 ` Matt Turner
2013-08-09 19:17 ` Michał Górny
2013-08-09 20:32 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-09 23:32 ` Mike Auty
2013-08-10 0:03 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-10 10:51 ` Patrick Lauer
2013-08-10 10:59 ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-10 11:12 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2013-08-10 11:38 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-09 11:37 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2013-08-09 11:58 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-10 10:50 ` Patrick Lauer
2013-08-10 11:40 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2013-08-09 12:28 ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-09 14:22 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2013-08-09 14:44 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2013-08-09 14:50 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2013-08-09 14:51 ` Arun Raghavan
2013-08-09 14:57 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2013-08-09 15:02 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2013-08-09 15:25 ` hasufell
2013-08-09 16:12 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-09 15:12 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-10 11:04 ` Patrick Lauer
2013-08-10 11:42 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-10 11:51 ` Michael Weber
2013-08-10 16:50 ` William Hubbs
2013-08-09 16:43 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2013-08-09 14:59 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-10 11:03 ` Patrick Lauer
2013-08-10 11:52 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-09 17:45 ` William Hubbs
2013-08-10 10:55 ` Patrick Lauer
2013-08-10 11:12 ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-10 11:59 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-10 12:16 ` Ben Kohler
2013-08-09 13:44 ` Samuli Suominen
2013-08-09 12:36 ` hasufell
2013-08-09 13:13 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-10 19:34 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steven J. Long
2013-08-10 19:49 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-23 13:27 ` Steven J. Long
2013-08-23 15:54 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-09 13:49 ` [gentoo-dev] " Samuli Suominen
2013-08-09 14:40 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2013-08-09 15:42 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-09 16:35 ` Samuli Suominen
2013-08-09 17:06 ` Samuli Suominen
2013-08-09 10:42 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-09-11 9:41 ` Olav Vitters
2013-09-11 11:15 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-08-08 18:12 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-09 0:27 ` Patrick Lauer
2013-08-09 3:08 ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-09 9:16 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-09 14:57 ` Walter Dnes
2013-08-09 15:47 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-10 4:03 ` Walter Dnes
2013-08-10 6:54 ` Samuli Suominen
2013-08-08 15:26 ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-08 16:05 ` Alex Xu
2013-08-08 16:09 ` William Hubbs
[not found] ` < 5202DD20.8050906@gentoo.org>
[not found] ` < CAMUzOag6DkLLn7OpBRhkHsRGFWOjvMv_WDrT+cm0S-bewT=JhQ@mail.gmail.com>
2013-08-08 6:21 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2013-08-08 6:26 ` Daniel Campbell
2013-08-08 7:05 ` KDE/semantic-desktop, was: " Andreas K. Huettel
2013-08-08 14:59 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: KDE/semantic-desktop Martin Vaeth
2013-08-08 17:44 ` Martin Vaeth
2013-08-08 17:52 ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-08 18:15 ` Chris Reffett
2013-08-08 9:45 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8 hasufell
2013-08-08 11:23 ` Rich Freeman
[not found] ` < pan$a65ab$e0ddc4a9$415605ad$324469f5@cox.net>
[not found] ` <52033A27.2070103@sporkbox.us >
2013-08-08 8:27 ` Duncan
[not found] ` < 52033A27.2070103@sporkbox.us>
[not found] ` <pan$f2635$5ee40939$18f8a55$7afd54a5@cox.net >
2013-08-08 8:33 ` Duncan
2013-08-07 15:16 ` Pacho Ramos [this message]
2013-08-08 6:19 ` [gentoo-dev] " Daniel Campbell
2013-08-08 15:13 ` William Hubbs
2013-08-08 9:39 ` Ben de Groot
2013-08-08 9:49 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-08 10:38 ` Samuli Suominen
2013-08-08 20:40 ` Mike Auty
2013-08-08 21:06 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-08-09 0:17 ` Mike Auty
2013-08-09 0:26 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2013-08-09 6:24 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-08-09 9:26 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2013-08-09 9:51 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-08-09 10:22 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2013-08-09 10:35 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-08-11 5:41 ` Samuli Suominen
2013-08-11 7:31 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-08-11 7:51 ` Samuli Suominen
2013-08-11 11:14 ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-11 8:02 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2013-08-08 23:19 ` Greg KH
2013-08-09 0:26 ` Mike Auty
2013-08-09 9:35 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-09 22:46 ` Mike Auty
2013-08-10 22:42 ` Wulf C. Krueger
2013-08-10 23:10 ` Mike Auty
2013-08-10 23:45 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2013-08-11 1:15 ` Mike Auty
2013-08-11 1:42 ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-11 0:01 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-11 13:41 ` Walter Dnes
2013-08-11 14:03 ` Walter Dnes
2013-08-09 0:25 ` Michael Weber
2013-08-09 5:29 ` Samuli Suominen
2013-08-09 6:28 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-08-09 6:27 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-08-10 19:57 ` Roy Bamford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1375888590.1870.6.camel@localhost \
--to=pacho@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox