From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3260C1381F3 for ; Sat, 3 Aug 2013 16:37:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 113AAE0B95; Sat, 3 Aug 2013 16:37:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.3]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6FEE0AFB for ; Sat, 3 Aug 2013 16:37:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [62.3.120.142] (helo=NeddySeagoon_SSD) by smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V5epF-0002rY-Hr for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2013 17:37:05 +0100 Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 17:37:05 +0100 From: Roy Bamford Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] OpenRc-0.12 is coming soon To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20130803152859.GA25817@linux1> (from williamh@gentoo.org on Sat Aug 3 16:28:59 2013) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.4.13 Message-Id: <1375547825.2809.3@NeddySeagoon_SSD> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-zkdipwUWWvlZ84N/NXKr" X-Originating-smarthost01b-IP: [62.3.120.142] X-Archives-Salt: 6953395e-c0ee-4fe2-b633-50f28cf4d941 X-Archives-Hash: bb14a114767df8a2ec77c5e9a0251a50 --=-zkdipwUWWvlZ84N/NXKr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2013.08.03 16:28, William Hubbs wrote: [snip] >=20 > Ok all, I would like to appologise for the harsh wording. >=20 > Markos, to answer your question, there are folks on the team, and at > least one user, using OpenRc from git without issues, so as far as I > know there shouldn't be any breakage. >=20 > I guess I was a little more harsh than I should have been, because I > know there are users out here who want ~arch to be rock solid, and I > have caught flack before from some of that crowd. >=20 > William >=20 >=20 ~arch is not rock solid and isn't supposed to be. I do like Williams=20 approach to posting a warning about the upcoming change so I cam manage=20 it for myself, if I'm feeling nervous. Any notification of key packages changing like this is appreciated. --=20 Regards, Roy Bamford (Neddyseagoon) a member of elections gentoo-ops forum-mods trustees = --=-zkdipwUWWvlZ84N/NXKr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJR/TGxAAoJEFZf0zWq3OcJ/ZUQAKMZt0z6c8FOXRI0pRCPpJmB 7K5+xcu7BeIpZu6etD4sFSy0yDjS+4X9nbwmwUm9yd9bMjVGolj0RZXxgMRXx9/E TJhHIdUjsCPrtqbTQBce4Qmx0q6ytXmIbMi7z26wDrHdil/aHLZVn/7+YeWyERK8 YUl9yv8AhAlBJBYqqOEXVSpMWxO1fzLRs8PYkpjb9202ze6Jb3fR+MOMHvyrtUKB RzSHPyxPT3ekg0itN7H8M+BicY4sQTaKcYlvj+dIOt/Kf6FeTuDYl9yYk/eBZcfW vMIAptddUpOV1YoseNKyXKSMH8mjhv0t0RbLKrsnu4T0irRoqbcF4ntiLulIP2Ps k08qwnS9iqIdrV/L22kU0gNvfpZPW8m7a8zB3Ic1GYQc/1eCYZLCcrRo9Ud7uTi3 yQY3lwVeLtqz5BT/VVhhWfcocuk4jUiNW1LZLRqS6hMr0IHqJIZmZ8py5i5Z9ulZ e3jigVU2lDQw2lRIqml7zD6+i/aPb0FJG00cloeDw5R3CpyXdDMCk+h/RDrJrDVx x68SkyHtuqyMW9cdx8SYxDHNLJOol8V18uWRTvOhO5SFvksYTBQGnBH4I+14jawy t9kDXzfu29TqPUel+7r5WXe4iXsyMvjErniJW+9eM06z1eCOcG3BFcohMsjDOpds pio9nWk96SvUD955zuPM =PHq/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-zkdipwUWWvlZ84N/NXKr--