From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ECE11381F3 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 19:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EA50E0B21; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 19:59:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7A9BE0B19 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 19:59:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (121.Red-2-137-23.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.23.121]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8C4733E68C for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 19:59:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1372708771.8880.1.camel@localhost> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-kernel] Proper distribution integration of kernel *-sources, patches and configuration. From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 21:59:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20130701164149.131490f8@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <51D1CADB.4030503@gentoo.org> <20130701192436.GB30808@kroah.com> <20130701214040.1d6ce0a1@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 84546384-9642-4867-be5d-6b85642397fa X-Archives-Hash: 0b5d343543c1d252322d9d10cd38282a El lun, 01-07-2013 a las 21:55 +0200, Fabio Erculiani escribió: > I believe that end users would benefit more from kernel binary ebuilds > (ebuilds building an actual kernel with an official config), rather > than all this. > I don't see them exclusionary, look different issues to me :/ (with completely different solutions I think)