From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-60929-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 059FC1381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:38:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1763CE096B;
	Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:38:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34099E0933
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:38:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.33] (194.Red-2-137-19.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.19.194])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: pacho)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0FF333E532;
	Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:38:34 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1371497910.22480.22.camel@localhost>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] How to spread intltool fixes to all packages
From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, "gnome@gentoo.org" <gnome@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 21:38:30 +0200
In-Reply-To: <201306170105.42908.vapier@gentoo.org>
References: <1370944514.4583.28.camel@localhost>
	 <201306170105.42908.vapier@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.3 
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Archives-Salt: e796d500-21ec-479f-9292-8ae4b25bb6cb
X-Archives-Hash: 0e6119f05ed378617ec14864fa16b94c

El lun, 17-06-2013 a las 01:05 -0400, Mike Frysinger escribió:
[...]
> ELT-PATCHES is only used by elibtoolize which means it requires an explicit 
> call to patch things
> 
> you're basically talking about the same type of problem that 
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/220040 tried to address.  maybe we should update 
> autotools.eclass to have a general patching mechanism since any EAPI based one 
> is doomed to failure.  and then we rebase elibtoolize to that.
> -mike

It looks a bit ambitious to me, but, if you think it is not so hard to
do, would be interesting :O