From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69FF1381F3 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 14:38:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5F67E0966; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 14:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14179E094F for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 14:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (194.Red-2-137-19.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.19.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DD2033BE70 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 14:38:46 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1371393523.22480.6.camel@localhost> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Lastrites: rox-base/rox-clib, sys-firmware/iwl3945-ucode, rox-extra/downloadmanager, sys-cluster/mpi-dotnet, media-tv/livestation, dev-lang/boo, gnome-extra/contacts, net-im/qutecom, net-fs/djmount, dev-python/gtkhtml-python, =gnome-extra/gtkhtml-2.11.1, app-office/osmo,app-office/taxbird,app-editors/fte, dev-util/monodoc, dev-dotnet/njb-sharp,net-wireless/ipw3945, net-wireless/ipw3945-ucode, net-wireless/ipw3945d From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 16:38:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1371328670.17293.9.camel@localhost> <1371388766.22480.2.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 4aed9736-3037-4ae4-a0df-febee3ea9aa6 X-Archives-Hash: 5e2610e73dc5ae952cfabfb2f3eeee04 El dom, 16-06-2013 a las 14:09 +0000, Duncan escribió: > Pacho Ramos posted on Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:19:26 +0200 as excerpted: > > > El dom, 16-06-2013 a las 12:42 +0000, Duncan escribió: > >> Pacho Ramos posted on Sat, 15 Jun 2013 22:37:50 +0200 as excerpted: > >> > >> [Snipped as my comment refers to the subject] > >> > >> Could you split-up announcements like this into multiple announcements, > >> so the subject lines remain a reasonable length, please? > > > > I am not sure it deserves the effort, or do you have any idea about how > > to send all this in splitted mails easily (currently, I need to simply > > add all the mask entry and copy it to the mail body) :/ > > If it's a (semi-)manual process as the "simply add all" seems to imply, > you could just do it in smaller chunks, say no more than number, simply eyeballing it's fine> a half-dozen packages at a time, so > the subject length stays reasonable. Or as I said if the packages are > all related, don't worry about the length as it'd then be reasonably easy > to glance at and say "oh, that's nothing I care about anyway" or "that > interests me I better look closer". It's a manual process, then, will try to divide them. Currently, length depends on how many opened bugs are pending each time I review the queue ;)