From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671C31381F3 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 21:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8266E08BD; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 21:09:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC127E085B for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 21:09:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (23.Red-2-137-58.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.58.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3FDC233E306 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 21:09:56 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1370380192.27731.8.camel@localhost> Subject: [gentoo-dev] About lafilefixer removal From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 23:09:52 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ad3c81fa-e3e4-47aa-aca0-6be67893cbf6 X-Archives-Hash: 90f0896852ba94d2fa84c1e0175b5e69 It lacks a maintainer for a long time, also has some opened bugs and I am unsure if it's still needed. I am not using it for months and never saw any problem, also, portage fixes .la files by itself, and paludis people don't approve lafilefixer. Do we still need it?