From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C69B41381F3 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 07:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CDE5E0D02; Sun, 26 May 2013 07:54:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 475FBE0CF8 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 07:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (15.Red-2-137-4.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.4.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB20E33DF65 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 07:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1369554882.2884.5.camel@localhost> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697) From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 09:54:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20130525184830.5bb25483@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 6b74ecb3-b174-4684-82e3-545cf86b4e98 X-Archives-Hash: bb8bac1b30d913b070aa4553bcb85729 El dom, 26-05-2013 a las 15:23 +0800, Ben de Groot escribió: [...] > But it isn't even like that. I'm not taking away anyone's freedom to > use systemd. You are doing as you are forcing them to have a semi-usable setup when merging packages. > You can do so if you wish. You can add unit files to your > system by yourself, or use an overlay. There are various ways this > could be realized even within Gentoo. Who are you to force people to use an overlay? Why are you forbidding the inclusion of unit files? Maybe you could also have a separate overlay called "systemd-haters" to maintain that ebuilds done to obstacle systemd usage. > > But you seem to dismiss all of those, and will only be happy by > forcing maintainers to add support to packages they maintain, even if > they believe it is a bad idea. > Nobody is forcing you to maintain that unit file: the unit file will be maintained by the other co-maintainer or systemd team if he cannot do that.