From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51FF81381F3 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 07:46:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AE9FE0CFC; Sun, 26 May 2013 07:46:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0BC1E0CE7 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 07:46:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (53.Red-2-137-53.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.53.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3864E33DF0E for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 07:46:23 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1369554380.2884.2.camel@localhost> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697) From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 09:46:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1369552925.8150.12.camel@storm> References: <51A0FF5E.5070304@gentoo.org> <51A116B1.8010902@gentoo.org> <1369552925.8150.12.camel@storm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 306d1306-0176-48e9-ac5c-8c46add58dc2 X-Archives-Hash: cba47a4052cff5abe03c7551e2359027 El dom, 26-05-2013 a las 09:22 +0200, Tiziano Müller escribió: [...] > > Can I ask the systemd people to design a working solution for opting > > out? I can't support this initiative without such a solution and I > > would be happy to work with the systemd people to reach it, ie I'll test. > > > > Maybe we have to find a more generic solution for this, because there is > bug #235944 [1] which request extra config snippets for rsyslog added to > various packages. Or is this something different? If yes, how? > > Best, > Tiziano > > > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=235944 > Probably a better solution should be found but, until then, we should behave with unit files like we behave for all other similar cases (like logrotate, even init.d files for openrc, bash-completion files...)