From: "Tiziano Müller" <dev-zero@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697)
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 09:22:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1369552925.8150.12.camel@storm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51A116B1.8010902@gentoo.org>
Am Samstag, den 25.05.2013, 15:53 -0400 schrieb Anthony G. Basile:
> On 05/25/2013 02:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > On 05/25/2013 05:14 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
> >> But if a co-maintainer pushes through a change that I oppose, then
> >> working together becomes quite difficult. In this case I opted to
> >> give up maintainership.
> >>
> > Ben,
> >
> > We've been working together, in the same team(s), for more than 4
> > years and we never had a single problem in co-maintaining packages. I
> > would never expected you to make so much noise because I committed a
> > file (yes a file, *not* a patch) that changes absolutely *nothing* to
> > existing users but it helps all those users who want to use systemd.
> >
> > I am very disappointed and confused.
> >
> > You should have known me better by now.
> >
> > - --
> > Regards,
> > Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
> >
>
> We are moving too quickly on bug #448882 ([Tracker] packages not
> providing systemd units). We should come to better consensus on systemd
> integration and we were getting there with the idea of INSTALL_MASK. I
> don't know that it is a working solution yet. I have to oppose adding
> unit files unless we have a way to opt out for reasons I gave earlier,
> regarding embedded systems where one needs to conserve space
> aggressively. And we may have found a way to do so without cluttering
> ebuilds with USE flags.
Even though I don't care about a couple of files more on my FS I would
prefer to find a solution with functions provided by PMS, not portage
alone.
>
> Can I ask the systemd people to design a working solution for opting
> out? I can't support this initiative without such a solution and I
> would be happy to work with the systemd people to reach it, ie I'll test.
>
Maybe we have to find a more generic solution for this, because there is
bug #235944 [1] which request extra config snippets for rsyslog added to
various packages. Or is this something different? If yes, how?
Best,
Tiziano
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=235944
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-26 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-25 16:14 [gentoo-dev] Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697) Ben de Groot
2013-05-25 16:48 ` Michał Górny
2013-05-25 17:38 ` Rich Freeman
2013-05-25 20:02 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2013-05-25 20:40 ` Rich Freeman
2013-05-25 20:45 ` Michał Górny
2013-05-25 21:38 ` Luca Barbato
2013-05-26 7:23 ` Ben de Groot
2013-05-26 7:43 ` Michał Górny
2013-05-26 10:04 ` Rich Freeman
2013-05-26 15:21 ` Ben de Groot
2013-05-26 16:15 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-05-26 17:14 ` Matt Turner
2013-05-26 17:19 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2013-05-26 7:54 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-05-25 17:00 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-05-25 17:14 ` Carlos Silva
2013-05-26 7:15 ` Ben de Groot
2013-05-26 7:44 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-05-26 7:45 ` Michał Górny
2013-05-26 9:59 ` Luca Barbato
2013-05-25 18:13 ` Markos Chandras
2013-05-25 19:53 ` Anthony G. Basile
2013-05-25 19:58 ` Mike Gilbert
2013-05-25 21:55 ` Anthony G. Basile
2013-05-25 19:59 ` Rich Freeman
2013-05-26 7:00 ` Michał Górny
2013-05-26 7:22 ` Tiziano Müller [this message]
2013-05-26 7:46 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-05-26 7:49 ` Michał Górny
2013-05-26 7:00 ` Ben de Groot
2013-05-26 7:37 ` [gentoo-dev] Reusing systemd unit file format / forking systemd (was: Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697)) Michał Górny
2013-05-26 8:32 ` Ben de Groot
2013-05-26 9:49 ` Rich Freeman
2013-05-26 10:12 ` Robert David
2013-05-26 10:31 ` Michał Górny
2013-05-26 11:12 ` Rich Freeman
2013-05-26 11:31 ` Robert David
2013-05-26 11:47 ` [gentoo-dev] Reusing systemd unit file format / forking systemd Luca Barbato
2013-05-26 10:23 ` Luca Barbato
2013-05-26 11:15 ` Michał Górny
2013-05-26 11:59 ` Luca Barbato
2013-05-26 13:35 ` Sergei Trofimovich
2013-05-26 14:22 ` Luca Barbato
[not found] <51A1A294.3000609@sporkbox.us>
2013-05-26 6:24 ` Re: [gentoo-dev] Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697) Daniel Campbell
2013-05-26 6:55 ` Michał Górny
2013-05-26 7:37 ` Daniel Campbell
2013-05-26 7:56 ` Pacho Ramos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1369552925.8150.12.camel@storm \
--to=dev-zero@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox