public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Tiziano Müller" <dev-zero@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697)
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 09:22:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1369552925.8150.12.camel@storm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51A116B1.8010902@gentoo.org>

Am Samstag, den 25.05.2013, 15:53 -0400 schrieb Anthony G. Basile:
> On 05/25/2013 02:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > On 05/25/2013 05:14 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
> >> But if a co-maintainer pushes through a change that I oppose, then
> >> working together becomes quite difficult. In this case I opted to
> >> give up maintainership.
> >>
> > Ben,
> >
> > We've been working together, in the same team(s), for more than 4
> > years and we never had a single problem in co-maintaining packages. I
> > would never expected you to make so much noise because I committed a
> > file (yes a file, *not* a patch) that changes absolutely *nothing* to
> > existing users but it helps all those users who want to use systemd.
> >
> > I am very disappointed and confused.
> >
> > You should have known me better by now.
> >
> > - -- 
> > Regards,
> > Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
> >
> 
> We are moving too quickly on bug #448882 ([Tracker] packages not 
> providing systemd units).  We should come to better consensus on systemd 
> integration and we were getting there with the idea of INSTALL_MASK. I 
> don't know that it is a working solution yet.  I have to oppose adding 
> unit files unless we have a way to opt out for reasons I gave earlier, 
> regarding embedded systems where one needs to conserve space 
> aggressively.  And we may have found a way to do so without cluttering 
> ebuilds with USE flags.

Even though I don't care about a couple of files more on my FS I would
prefer to find a solution with functions provided by PMS, not portage
alone.

> 
> Can I ask the systemd people to design a working solution for opting 
> out?  I can't support this initiative without such a solution and I 
> would be happy to work with the systemd people to reach it, ie I'll test.
> 

Maybe we have to find a more generic solution for this, because there is
bug #235944 [1] which request extra config snippets for rsyslog added to
various packages. Or is this something different? If yes, how?

Best,
Tiziano


[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=235944



  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-05-26  7:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-25 16:14 [gentoo-dev] Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697) Ben de Groot
2013-05-25 16:48 ` Michał Górny
2013-05-25 17:38   ` Rich Freeman
2013-05-25 20:02     ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2013-05-25 20:40       ` Rich Freeman
2013-05-25 20:45       ` Michał Górny
2013-05-25 21:38   ` Luca Barbato
2013-05-26  7:23   ` Ben de Groot
2013-05-26  7:43     ` Michał Górny
2013-05-26 10:04       ` Rich Freeman
2013-05-26 15:21         ` Ben de Groot
2013-05-26 16:15           ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-05-26 17:14             ` Matt Turner
2013-05-26 17:19             ` Andreas K. Huettel
2013-05-26  7:54     ` Pacho Ramos
2013-05-25 17:00 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-05-25 17:14   ` Carlos Silva
2013-05-26  7:15   ` Ben de Groot
2013-05-26  7:44     ` Pacho Ramos
2013-05-26  7:45     ` Michał Górny
2013-05-26  9:59       ` Luca Barbato
2013-05-25 18:13 ` Markos Chandras
2013-05-25 19:53   ` Anthony G. Basile
2013-05-25 19:58     ` Mike Gilbert
2013-05-25 21:55       ` Anthony G. Basile
2013-05-25 19:59     ` Rich Freeman
2013-05-26  7:00     ` Michał Górny
2013-05-26  7:22     ` Tiziano Müller [this message]
2013-05-26  7:46       ` Pacho Ramos
2013-05-26  7:49       ` Michał Górny
2013-05-26  7:00   ` Ben de Groot
2013-05-26  7:37 ` [gentoo-dev] Reusing systemd unit file format / forking systemd (was: Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697)) Michał Górny
2013-05-26  8:32   ` Ben de Groot
2013-05-26  9:49     ` Rich Freeman
2013-05-26 10:12       ` Robert David
2013-05-26 10:31         ` Michał Górny
2013-05-26 11:12           ` Rich Freeman
2013-05-26 11:31           ` Robert David
2013-05-26 11:47             ` [gentoo-dev] Reusing systemd unit file format / forking systemd Luca Barbato
2013-05-26 10:23   ` Luca Barbato
2013-05-26 11:15     ` Michał Górny
2013-05-26 11:59       ` Luca Barbato
2013-05-26 13:35         ` Sergei Trofimovich
2013-05-26 14:22           ` Luca Barbato
     [not found] <51A1A294.3000609@sporkbox.us>
2013-05-26  6:24 ` Re: [gentoo-dev] Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697) Daniel Campbell
2013-05-26  6:55   ` Michał Górny
2013-05-26  7:37     ` Daniel Campbell
2013-05-26  7:56     ` Pacho Ramos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1369552925.8150.12.camel@storm \
    --to=dev-zero@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox