From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-60439-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2E01381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 25 May 2013 17:00:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0794E0BC6;
	Sat, 25 May 2013 17:00:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FC8DE0BB8
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 25 May 2013 17:00:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.34] (174.Red-80-39-197.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [80.39.197.174])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: pacho)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9C54335E17
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 25 May 2013 17:00:19 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1369501216.3001.4.camel@localhost>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug
 412697)
From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 19:00:16 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAB9SyzRjbXQPv2UouB3qKW+DBhA+=r4DBsMtKLaXJ9LeTev1hg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
	<CAB9SyzRjbXQPv2UouB3qKW+DBhA+=r4DBsMtKLaXJ9LeTev1hg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.2 
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Archives-Salt: 867c0174-4307-4bfe-b9a6-44837903c643
X-Archives-Hash: 6caecaed66ebd60a526f1dd30199aba2

El dom, 26-05-2013 a las 00:14 +0800, Ben de Groot escribió:
> I'm taking this from https://bugs.gentoo.org/412697 to the dev mailing
> list, since this discussion doesn't really belong on bugzilla.
> 
> Some background copied from the bug report:
[...]

Probably your following comment in bug report summarizes the real
reasons pointing you to not apply that patch after waiting a year for
upstream action:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412697#c8

Reading your comments in bug report gave me the impression of you
refusing to provide the unit file simply to try to interfere as much as
possible with getting higher systemd compatibility in Gentoo, even if I
don't see how adding the unit file will hurt openrc users and how it
will hurt you (as co-maintainer) when another dev is taking care of unit
file and systemd team can also maintain it.

We can now have long discussions about upstream decisions, how to handle
devrel problems... but I think it's much more easy: this kind of
"boycott" attitudes should stop in favor of common sense.