From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-60129-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6935C1381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed,  8 May 2013 18:20:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6766EE09DC;
	Wed,  8 May 2013 18:19:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 797F2E09B6
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  8 May 2013 18:19:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.33] (21.Red-2-137-27.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.27.21])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: pacho)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BDCDF33DFE5
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  8 May 2013 18:19:52 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1368037189.3632.39.camel@localhost>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users
From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 20:19:49 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAB9SyzS1p5tG-=sWRiRoSFROokC5pJ-8x19GG-WS-vHGVwuWBQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
	<CAN3Atvo+RgmFgCYMzqjsuL4G89cJv_J7SXg42qfT3r1xQtEuTQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAB9SyzR_OxTeZhWy8v1z06gWjBMQQZ7iyGQWKHcW+3tw+Rk-ew@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAN3AtvrfwkyNzBNX6Hbs-v2KL-ynqFKqBzDbVw3vjZ9TF6OOHg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAB9SyzS1p5tG-=sWRiRoSFROokC5pJ-8x19GG-WS-vHGVwuWBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.1 
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Archives-Salt: 63dc290c-f1c1-42ba-ac51-5d25e8604bf3
X-Archives-Hash: d4cfdad38112021ca7e00d1a44c0dab3

El mié, 08-05-2013 a las 23:49 +0800, Ben de Groot escribió:
[...]
> It sounds more wrong to me to be asking normal package maintainers to
> test and maintain unit files, while they don't use systemd themselves,
> nor have it installed. Nor would most of our users need this.
> 
> And I believe the council has only spoken out against using a useflag
> for installing such files. Afaik they haven't spoken out against a
> systemd-units package. Please refer me to their decision if I'm wrong.
> 
> --
> Cheers,
> 
> Ben | yngwin
> Gentoo developer
> Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin
> 
> 

And, why not allow systemd team (or systemd-units@g.o if it's created)
to test and add the unit files to each affected package? If the reported
bug is caused by unit file, that team could handle it