From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-59776-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873A21381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:19:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BBADCE0AE8;
	Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:19:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4E65E0AE4
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:19:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.33] (37.Red-2-137-218.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.218.37])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: pacho)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD0C133DDA8;
	Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:19:04 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1366651141.14686.4.camel@localhost>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: emul-linux-x86-xlibs deps being replaced in
 gx86
From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: multilib@gentoo.org
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:19:01 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAB9SyzRC5C-0czG+BfsTOgbUT2wxbzQSwVMYow5Fzn_SvF5d9w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20130421214304.7b08fa57@pomiocik.lan>
	 <CAB9SyzQwVCOyOdYs7q82ZcguKwwJrEW4ja_bZ1svUF9eEp5iuQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAEdQ38EtL5japN1jw3fbaNTMtY4mzaAOZPFo8MgVGE+4UnDemQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAB9SyzRC5C-0czG+BfsTOgbUT2wxbzQSwVMYow5Fzn_SvF5d9w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.1 
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Archives-Salt: 511af667-831c-46b0-97e4-2093f8586c9e
X-Archives-Hash: 58e9381f24a06f733b8d9c584819e205

El mar, 23-04-2013 a las 01:03 +0800, Ben de Groot escribió:
> On 22 April 2013 23:38, Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org> wrote:
>         Do I assume correctly that this is a response to the freetype
>         and
>         fontconfig multilib bugs?
> 
> 
> This thread is not directly about that, but it is related.
> 
> 
> I'm not convinced that this multilib solution is mature enough to be
> pushed so speedily into the tree. But maybe I'm the only one...
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> 
> Ben | yngwin
> Gentoo developer
> Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin

I don't know why do you think that solution is not mature enough, what
specific problems are you *currently* hitting? I think mgorny already
handled the freetype problem with its headers