From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873A21381F3 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:19:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BBADCE0AE8; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:19:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4E65E0AE4 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (37.Red-2-137-218.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.218.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD0C133DDA8; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:19:04 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1366651141.14686.4.camel@localhost> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: emul-linux-x86-xlibs deps being replaced in gx86 From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: multilib@gentoo.org Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:19:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20130421214304.7b08fa57@pomiocik.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 511af667-831c-46b0-97e4-2093f8586c9e X-Archives-Hash: 58e9381f24a06f733b8d9c584819e205 El mar, 23-04-2013 a las 01:03 +0800, Ben de Groot escribió: > On 22 April 2013 23:38, Matt Turner wrote: > Do I assume correctly that this is a response to the freetype > and > fontconfig multilib bugs? > > > This thread is not directly about that, but it is related. > > > I'm not convinced that this multilib solution is mature enough to be > pushed so speedily into the tree. But maybe I'm the only one... > > > -- > Cheers, > > Ben | yngwin > Gentoo developer > Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin I don't know why do you think that solution is not mature enough, what specific problems are you *currently* hitting? I think mgorny already handled the freetype problem with its headers