From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7157D1381F3 for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 20:13:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A9BE1E0ECF; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 20:13:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost04.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost04.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.4]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB8FAE0EC7 for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 20:13:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [62.3.120.142] (helo=NeddySeagoon) by smarthost04.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UOvxp-0003Lm-6D for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 20:13:21 +0000 Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 21:13:20 +0100 From: Roy Bamford Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] news item -- baselayout-1.x deprecation final warning To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20130407193642.GA14048@linux1> (from williamh@gentoo.org on Sun Apr 7 20:36:42 2013) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.4.13 Message-Id: <1365365600.20909.1@NeddySeagoon> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-QbAfjPAjFKdb+rzzvPgo" X-Originating-Smarthost04-IP: [62.3.120.142] X-Archives-Salt: 486fb798-3c54-45b4-9a05-eebc64d3da8f X-Archives-Hash: d929b360e10e61e08374b330ee8c763c --=-QbAfjPAjFKdb+rzzvPgo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2013.04.07 20:36, William Hubbs wrote: > All, >=20 > We have continued support for baselayout-1 to baselayout-2/OpenRc > migration for almost two years now, so I think it is about time we > kill > this off. >=20 > Here is the news item I want to send out on 10 Apr. >=20 > Let me know what you think. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > William >=20 >=20 If you do not upgrade your systems to openrc-0.11.8 before it leaves=20 the tree, you may need to reinstall them. I think you mean If you do not upgrade your systems to baselayout-2 and openrc-0.11.8=20 before openrc-0.11.8 leaves the tree, you may need to reinstall them. The problem is with baselayout-1 and that's what needs to be updated. The "you may need to reinstall them" is a bit over the top. You can=20 always pick up the pieces with a liveCD. Do you need to point out that the old (" ... ") syntax will no longer=20 be supported, or do you intend to tolerate the baselayout-1 syntax in=20 /etc/conf.d/net and friends a while longer. A friendly link to the update guide=20 http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/openrc-migration.xml may be in order too. I've seen many users on baselayout-2 with baselayout-1 net files. This=20 news item will bypass them. --=20 Regards, Roy Bamford (Neddyseagoon) a member of elections gentoo-ops forum-mods trustees = --=-QbAfjPAjFKdb+rzzvPgo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJRYdNgAAoJEFZf0zWq3OcJpvUQAKh0xJYmsirNGy49Bwh6CgPW 0Qpolso1W66y8qiB50iDYIE9ktEB93UYmDbUOwLUgA6sDQY6TrDgrhFX+CcwgV8B vNK5V6VfuDCjcxF0ibUMGp+AW3cckL0cezTUvxBgaYVoAnsDuxP0bOZNEzZTc2Z2 jDUbSvoGgLuqT2hZ5ttRxUK88G+q40Uh99eMdiFB7b5GG+kM6G9N1n9JsKHdqHEz 2vHiz66ukNgaIdmzuh0oaRks7mqR/QyjeRBcMqcNf4rcOZAZAG1Ro4aH1UuSM2iF kR8dIz82PS6ZonYvfsR2mKkIifFKgyiG3nGEK9tkVxoYuyE0Tp/Ac75gMFLol8lc NqVMWbUAzBQomi9sfDA1E9TyZrI0CCcehZpxk8p1UcyTzcWwvfiZEdz4hrj1/zi6 Fko/e5f2cM1prknuXHrHiTMbRbB/t2UqG6d/KmI0zeqGafx5JXyqtQwKyKxh8xO+ jWV50Cfhq4zIHY+/0rWXh233QBp7DwD08/gAdwu5phZ9QkUfy8IoWXK7iFtFryEF L8wsWGLyYlK0a2cm90Rf/ZbvMPUCZLa+icbe6gIYgnqeIXxVoSPJyVlPqScb5kFr YlxgunlaP/U3zACJB6GQ2lO4o0F7TbMU/brGSSyoNriVgsavKb74uKFdULMPWigp NvnjOAemb8hzNcfOfi5D =WVy5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-QbAfjPAjFKdb+rzzvPgo--