From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80FB61381F3 for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 18:19:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 659B6E0929; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 18:19:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from silver.linx.net (silver.linx.net [77.72.229.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E744AE07A5; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 18:19:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by silver.linx.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78DB810F5D; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 19:18:59 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at linx.net Received: from silver.linx.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (silver.linx.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id RIiURxC4VuP4; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 19:18:46 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.253.2] (nexus.vroon.org [82.69.120.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tony@linx.net) by silver.linx.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8222110F57; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 19:18:46 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <1365272453.8288.14.camel@localhost> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Establishing Gentoo patch policy to keep our patches consistent and clean From: "Tony \"Chainsaw\" Vroon" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 19:20:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20130406200843.6831c4fe@pomiocik.lan> References: <20130406200843.6831c4fe@pomiocik.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 5ed3f188-2ec4-4349-9f4e-f446c7ac339d X-Archives-Hash: bbccd89bbd1b1a7b1cdd4a4022a80150 On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 20:08 +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > What are your thoughts? Sensible document. Can we have it on the agenda for the council meeting please. It looks suitable for a yes/no vote, and I expect some guidance from the wider developer community in how they respond on the list. Regards, Tony V.