From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F21138010 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 23:06:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DF14E0E30; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 23:06:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58B2EE0E1B for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 23:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2a01:e34:ee10:4dc0:922b:34ff:fe30:2648] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e34:ee10:4dc0:922b:34ff:fe30:2648]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: eva) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CFE3D33DC72 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 23:06:26 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1364943983.574.2.camel@kanae> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Global useflags zeroconf and avahi From: Gilles Dartiguelongue To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 01:06:23 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20130402094300.61361552@pomiocik.lan> References: <201304012359.03703.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <515A09EF.5000003@gentoo.org> <201304020043.32152.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <20130402094300.61361552@pomiocik.lan> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 62414b72-eb5e-4699-bcb5-ca5c8a713abb X-Archives-Hash: 8167e2a974e0c10b18009b60e86fa728 Le mardi 02 avril 2013 à 09:43 +0200, Michał Górny a écrit : > On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 00:43:31 +0200 > "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 00:27:59 schrieb Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn: > > > > I would like to suggest unifying use-flag usage, and use "zeroconf" > > > > anywhere. > > > > > > Sounds good. Do you think the same should apply to non-mDNS/DNS-SD based > > > zeroconf like UPnP/SSDP? > > > > No idea to be honest... :| opinions? > > The flags should be practical. I have no use for DNS-SD and other > magical junk, yet use UPnP/IGD for port forwarding. The flags should > let me just enable just that without pulling all other possible > variants I won't use. > > That said, USE=upnp was cleaned up a while ago. I don't think it should > be integrated with zeroconf. Yeah I don't think it should be merged into zeroconf even though it shares some of its technical base. Imho, zeroconf == dnssd/mdns & ipv4ll and upnp/upnp-av are as described in use.desc -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo