From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D6C198005 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:25:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A9D1E087E; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:25:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24BE9E07FC for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:25:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (157.Red-2-137-34.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.34.157]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 925E233DD7A for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:25:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-libs/freetype: freetype-2.4.11-r1.ebuild ChangeLog From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20130227192722.65a55ac5@portable> References: <20130225222029.D84D12171D@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <512E3E06.8010205@gentoo.org> <20130227185824.08f0d035@portable> <512E4D0E.9070700@gentoo.org> <20130227192722.65a55ac5@portable> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-vLgu+JR/zuZRBnyYnQ/d" Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:25:19 +0100 Message-ID: <1361996719.1929.10.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: 3a94149b-289d-457f-bae6-b59333421742 X-Archives-Hash: f1c9af4689d7c3567fc4686b0ec7da7d --=-vLgu+JR/zuZRBnyYnQ/d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El mi=C3=A9, 27-02-2013 a las 19:27 +0100, Alexis Ballier escribi=C3=B3: [...] > > The reason I bring this up again is that there was a strong argument > > yesterday in #gentoo-dev, so it seems the situation is NOT clear. >=20 > What are these arguments ? The IRC conspiracy is hard to follow :) >=20 I also read that argument... but it looked to turn more in a "personal" flame war than anything "technical". For example, I couldn't see how multilib-portage solves the issue of different headers provided for different arches (that looks to be the key problem that mgorny tried to solve in freetype) --=-vLgu+JR/zuZRBnyYnQ/d Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlEua68ACgkQCaWpQKGI+9SMBQCbB1Sya8CnYRw0It1ekGK2cWbl z9gAn11KykxqNS7myq7LDrs92sXBqOXp =EmZ4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vLgu+JR/zuZRBnyYnQ/d--