From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B1B1198005 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4BF5BE07C3; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:16:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59BCBE0782 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:16:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (157.Red-2-137-34.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.34.157]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CBB3733DCEB for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:15:58 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: autotools-multilib-minimal From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <512E03BF.6020305@gentoo.org> References: <51296027.705@gentoo.org> <51299593.1010902@gentoo.org> <20130224110620.662a9079@pomiocik.lan> <5129E750.1020000@flameeyes.eu> <512A210F.50703@gentoo.org> <512E03BF.6020305@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-f8yxAc1UYnLoZ9BLoiCl" Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:15:55 +0100 Message-ID: <1361996155.1929.2.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: 8c108353-13b6-4ae1-a43b-d5b5fc1c2ab4 X-Archives-Hash: e5b8d40448fde0d8658538ad997be867 --=-f8yxAc1UYnLoZ9BLoiCl Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El mi=C3=A9, 27-02-2013 a las 15:01 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribi=C3=B3: > On 24/02/13 16:17, hasufell wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 02/24/2013 11:11 AM, Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 wrote: > >> On 24/02/2013 11:06, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > >>> Then don't put 'autotools' in the name. > >> > >> +1 > >> > > > > That would be multilib-minimal.eclass then? >=20 > Sounds good to me. >=20 > > ABCD also suggested something else: > > autotools-multilib.eclass -> autotools-utils-multilib.eclass >=20 > This makes sense too, autotools-multilib.eclass is misleading as it=20 > embeds the "unrelated" autotools-utils.eclass >=20 > So it seems currently that some are against this eclass, some are=20 > against the whole idea and favour multilib-portage, some are against=20 > using autotools-utils.eclass for this, ... > Some people are already committing the eclass version changes/fixes to= =20 > tree, some are filing bug reports about bugs caused by it, ... >=20 > It would be nice if people agreed but I guess that is not happening, so= =20 > i'll be pushing this eclass to tree under name 'multilib-minimal.eclass'= =20 > if I don't hear compelling arguments for not doing so, or in case you=20 > push it before me >=20 > - Samuli >=20 >=20 Probably the way to reach higher consensus would be to have an eclass for supporting out of sources building and make other eclasses rely on that code, that way people can use autotools-utils or use new eclass "manually" as they prefer :/ Anyway I don't think autotools-utils includes so much changes :| --=-f8yxAc1UYnLoZ9BLoiCl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlEuaXsACgkQCaWpQKGI+9RvxQCcC5cUXfx6M3nJem99x40YuJjp 4oMAn3IBpBNdd7GwaBwwObu1KnVyJMC1 =4WPU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-f8yxAc1UYnLoZ9BLoiCl--