From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0802198005 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 15:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70B50E0748; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 15:12:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96822E0743 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 15:12:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (157.Red-2-137-34.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.34.157]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 25FBF33DCD5 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 15:12:21 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: autotools-multilib-minimal From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20130224155715.428b0493@pomiocik.lan> References: <51296027.705@gentoo.org> <51299593.1010902@gentoo.org> <20130224155715.428b0493@pomiocik.lan> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-9SA+oGp0OYDtve/GUcSK" Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 16:12:18 +0100 Message-ID: <1361718738.20067.54.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: d02ab63e-9c1e-4b6c-9ecc-3be0cae7d0af X-Archives-Hash: e0f9c0cb4111cc73df79d5be1d47c20c --=-9SA+oGp0OYDtve/GUcSK Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El dom, 24-02-2013 a las 15:57 +0100, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny escribi=C3=B3: [...] > > d) the previous point will also allow to convert go-mono.eclass package= s > > without introducing yet another eclass for that >=20 > So you're introducing a hacky eclass just because you're too lazy to > convert go-mono packages properly and too impatient to let others do > the work properly for you? Would be nice to know what autotools-utils.eclass is doing differently that is showing this problem with go-mono.eclass packages :/ Only one question, what is the reason for us having base.eclass and autotools-utils.eclass? I still try to use plain ebuilds without inheritting autotools-utils.eclass as I usually don't need it, probably others do the same and refuse to have to inherit it only for multilib support :/ How do you plan to solve this problem? I would also like to hear why that people refuses to use autotools-utils.eclass... because I don't have a strong opinion on this topic=20 --=-9SA+oGp0OYDtve/GUcSK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlEqLdIACgkQCaWpQKGI+9TQagCfWDM8HH/goRqwp5pfS7FY92Vk UowAn2TkHjM6nLkG8WRK7JJuodZFZfaI =GAI8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-9SA+oGp0OYDtve/GUcSK--