From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B83138AAE for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:26:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5707C21C021; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:26:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 517F921C010 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:26:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (157.Red-2-137-34.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.34.157]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D752133DB8D for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:26:23 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: install linux-firmware with kernel sources (was Re: Lastrite: Firmware cleanup, part #1) From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <512065C6.6000205@gentoo.org> References: <5117560B.3090709@gentoo.org> <20130210174634.77631769@sf> <1360508715.26312.8.camel@belkin4> <20130212113814.598ac903@ritchie.cs.ubc.ca> <20130212143040.3b1bd00d@ritchie.cs.ubc.ca> <511F23B5.7060905@gentoo.org> <512065C6.6000205@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-TREENjvzas1KQlMa5Lj7" Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 11:26:19 +0100 Message-ID: <1361096779.1920.62.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: 452c1a3e-1759-4b8f-8add-190e701afc9b X-Archives-Hash: abcb06f9b087806cb49583cd18faedaa --=-TREENjvzas1KQlMa5Lj7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Regarding licensing issues, maybe we could take fedora package as reference for clarifying firmware licenses and so: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/linux-firmware.git/tree/linux-firmware.s= pec --=-TREENjvzas1KQlMa5Lj7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlEgsEsACgkQCaWpQKGI+9RvCQCfSxSyd9ZNaRqc/1oenScSND45 gGgAn1/5HilkX+NT7+1zUBxAsyc0B0zd =NMzh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-TREENjvzas1KQlMa5Lj7--