From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB500138A86 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 14:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A23C21C02E; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 14:40:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E31321C015 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 14:40:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (157.Red-2-137-34.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.34.157]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 622BA33BF3D; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 14:40:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] scheme herd needs help From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: proxy-maint@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20130203214225.GB18608@freyja.radhermit.com> References: <1359809669.26423.52.camel@belkin4> <20130202180328.GA5890@lambda.fulax.fr> <1359898762.26423.170.camel@belkin4> <20130203212149.GA8022@lambda.fulax.fr> <20130203214225.GB18608@freyja.radhermit.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-n4XYZHNESrBoAHdhM7Tm" Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 15:40:48 +0100 Message-ID: <1361025648.1920.58.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: 1d5661f4-657c-4148-89a4-ae954b0a6c64 X-Archives-Hash: 8b257cd8c942e75b95de859ac5bd4008 --=-n4XYZHNESrBoAHdhM7Tm Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El dom, 03-02-2013 a las 13:42 -0800, Tim Harder escribi=C3=B3: > On 2013-02-03 Sun 13:21, Cyprien Nicolas wrote: > >> Who is behind lisp overlay? Only you or more people that could also be > >> contacted to try to get them maintaining guile? Thanks for the info > > > >We are 2 or 3 non-dev volonteers. pchrist is busy with life and > >common-lisp stuff, grozin and radhermit give a hand on some > >packages. The lisp overlay guys are easily rechable through > >#gentoo-lisp or gentoo-lisp mailing list. > > > >About guile, I'm the only one having touched it for the last 2 years > >[1]. I think I could proxy-maint it, with an experienced dev in > >eselect modules and multiple SLOT packages. >=20 > I can help maintain guile and will proxy stuff for you (but I'm not in > the proxy-maintainers herd). >=20 > Tim I think it's not a problem, you don't need to be in that herd for proxying. What final list of packages will be proxy maintained finally then? Looks like guile... but not sure about hop (most people would prefer to get in tree version also fixed instead of needing to rely on lisp overlay :/) Thanks --=-n4XYZHNESrBoAHdhM7Tm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlEfmnAACgkQCaWpQKGI+9TE0ACfSbFjoPm/cNqVBLYLvvBFI3lm AeUAoIZTFIItt0V06VQXukMmgeY41b6g =gWUj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-n4XYZHNESrBoAHdhM7Tm--