From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144281389FB for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:08:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B0BC521C04D; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:08:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2E8D21C005 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:08:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [217.70.181.52] (gilles.gandi.net [217.70.181.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: eva) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7693C33E69E for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:08:14 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1360768089.31361.2.camel@gilles.gandi.net> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC/PATCH] A cleaner API for virtualx.eclass From: Gilles Dartiguelongue To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 16:08:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1360620883-22562-1-git-send-email-mgorny@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: adb685d5-d70d-411b-858e-ff86aef852e1 X-Archives-Hash: ba435dd00602e0aff858c6b1900d276d Le lundi 11 février 2013 à 23:48 +0100, Diego Elio Pettenò a écrit : > I'd say, "Go for it!" > > But on the other hand I wonder if it might make sense to have > something more generic, so that one only has to call something in a > way such as > > virtualx_setup > run_tests --foo > virtualx_cleanup This sounds nice but is imho but can be elaborated later on. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo