public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] fcaps.eclass: bringing filesystem capabilities to the tree
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 01:10:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1359159053.32487.4.camel@kanae> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201301251851.45021.vapier@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 544 bytes --]

This might be a silly question already answered in a previous thread,
but why make it filecaps a USE-enable capability at all ?

It's not like libcap is a big dependency and it's not like this is an
attempt to make the system more secure by according just the privileges
needed for apps to work as intended, right ?

If the USE flag must stay, how is it different that current caps USE
flag ? It applies and not just enables support but is that relevant to
the purpose at hand ?

-- 
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org>
Gentoo

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-26  0:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-25 23:51 [gentoo-dev] fcaps.eclass: bringing filesystem capabilities to the tree Mike Frysinger
2013-01-26  0:10 ` Gilles Dartiguelongue [this message]
2013-01-26  0:17   ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2013-01-26  7:46   ` Mike Frysinger
2013-01-26 10:17     ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2013-01-26 16:01     ` [gentoo-dev] " Diego Elio Pettenò
2013-01-26 16:13       ` Rich Freeman
2013-01-26 17:02         ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2013-01-28 19:58     ` Gilles Dartiguelongue
2013-01-26 13:21 ` Michał Górny
2013-01-26 17:08   ` Mike Frysinger
2013-01-26 21:07 ` Doug Goldstein
2013-01-27 17:26 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-01-27 18:24   ` Kacper Kowalik
2013-01-29 12:14 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2013-01-30  0:47   ` Diego Elio Pettenò

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1359159053.32487.4.camel@kanae \
    --to=eva@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox