public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-dev] Confusing tmpfs information in udev news item
@ 2013-01-25 19:05 Pacho Ramos
  2013-01-25 19:22 ` Rich Freeman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pacho Ramos @ 2013-01-25 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 353 bytes --]

I got today the udev news item and found:
- "The need of CONFIG_DEVTMPFS=y in the kernel; need to verify the
fstype for possible /dev line in /etc/fstab is devtmpfs (and not, for
example, tmpfs)"

Does it apply to /dev/shm? That is the line I have in my fstab:
shm             /dev/shm                tmpfs
nodev,nosuid,noexec     0 0

Thanks

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] Confusing tmpfs information in udev news item
  2013-01-25 19:05 [gentoo-dev] Confusing tmpfs information in udev news item Pacho Ramos
@ 2013-01-25 19:22 ` Rich Freeman
  2013-01-25 19:28   ` Pacho Ramos
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rich Freeman @ 2013-01-25 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Does it apply to /dev/shm? That is the line I have in my fstab:
> shm             /dev/shm                tmpfs
> nodev,nosuid,noexec     0 0

No.  It applies ONLY to /dev - if you even have a /dev line, and if
you don't that is OK.

Rich


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] Confusing tmpfs information in udev news item
  2013-01-25 19:22 ` Rich Freeman
@ 2013-01-25 19:28   ` Pacho Ramos
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pacho Ramos @ 2013-01-25 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 433 bytes --]

El vie, 25-01-2013 a las 14:22 -0500, Rich Freeman escribió:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Does it apply to /dev/shm? That is the line I have in my fstab:
> > shm             /dev/shm                tmpfs
> > nodev,nosuid,noexec     0 0
> 
> No.  It applies ONLY to /dev - if you even have a /dev line, and if
> you don't that is OK.
> 
> Rich
> 
> 

Fine, thanks a lot!

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-25 19:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-25 19:05 [gentoo-dev] Confusing tmpfs information in udev news item Pacho Ramos
2013-01-25 19:22 ` Rich Freeman
2013-01-25 19:28   ` Pacho Ramos

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox