From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07084138636 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:21:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBE2521C110; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:21:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA90721C03A for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:21:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (210.Red-2-137-15.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.15.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6338433DAB0 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:21:17 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] news item for udev 197-r3 upgrade (yes, I know, it's late) From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <510059F1.5060902@gentoo.org> References: <50FFE241.6030107@gentoo.org> <1358976098.2026.42.camel@belkin4> <510059F1.5060902@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-l9/Sz0ZKMO3KqSAmW+mG" Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 23:21:12 +0100 Message-ID: <1358979672.2026.43.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: 30148dd6-1ae0-43ea-9b99-917b5b124f3c X-Archives-Hash: b8b048fc5d0d156308c32900c2dcd0a9 --=-l9/Sz0ZKMO3KqSAmW+mG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El mi=C3=A9, 23-01-2013 a las 23:45 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribi=C3=B3: > On 23/01/13 23:21, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > El mi=C3=A9, 23-01-2013 a las 15:14 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribi=C3= =B3: > >> please review this news item, seems we need one after all > > > > Why don't you drop "~" from: > > CONFIG_CHECK=3D"~DEVTMPFS" > > > > to ensure people really changes it in their kernel and prevent breakage= ? > > >=20 > That won't work because the host you run the package isn't necessarily= =20 > same as the one you are building it on > The build host doesn't need DEVTMPFS >=20 >=20 And couldn't that be done at install time? I mean, you can build and package new udev but installation will die if udev is going to be installed on a system without DEVTMPFS --=-l9/Sz0ZKMO3KqSAmW+mG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlEAYlgACgkQCaWpQKGI+9S89gCeMS0wfspcDcr1zT8f7o0gZs4f 0JcAnijdyIXw0srfv8DkhYFkn5+gpONk =BdF9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-l9/Sz0ZKMO3KqSAmW+mG--